Language selection

Search

Evaluation of the Strengthening Girls’ Capacities Through Sport and Play in Senegal (RECAF-Jeu) project - Executive summary

On this page

Rationale and purpose of the evaluation

The project “Strengthening Girls’ Capacities Through Sport and Play (RECAF-Jeu)” is an initiative of the Canadian NGO Right To Play (RTP) aimed at supporting the empowerment of adolescent girls and young women in Ziguinchor and Sédhiou, Senegal, over a five-year period (2021–2026). In other words, the RECAF-Jeu project, with a total budget of CAD 9,078,809 (including a contribution of CAD 8,671,322 from the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development, aims to raise partners’ awareness of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), gender equality, and positive masculinity, and to train them in RTP’s playful approaches, tools, and methodologies.

With a view to taking stock of the implementation of this initiative, the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD) deemed it appropriate to commission a formative evaluation of the RECAF-Jeu project. The main purpose of this formative evaluation is to inform key stakeholders about the progress achieved toward the project’s expected results as outlined in the logic model (LM) and other programming documents such as the project implementation plan (PIP) and the performance measurement framework (PMF). In addition, the evaluation aims to inform stakeholders about the main implementation challenges and the progress toward achieving expected results. The evaluation will review the project’s strategy; risks related to its sustainability and formulate recommendations to accelerate and/or reorient project implementation.

Evaluation objectives

Specifically, the objectives of this evaluation were to:

Scope of the evaluation

The scope of the evaluation covers the entire RECAF-Jeu project and its implementation modalities. It covers the period from September 2021 to September 2024. The evaluation concerns the project’s two target regions in Senegal, namely Ziguinchor and Sédhiou.

Development context

In Senegal, despite government policies supporting gender equality—particularly through the National Strategy for Gender Equity and Equality (SNEEG)—unfavorable traditional norms remain persistent. In addition to implementing the SNEEG, Senegal has been participating since 2015 in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), notably SDG 5, which aims to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.

Despite these efforts to promote gender equality through the progressive and effective integration of gender issues into the country’s socio-economic development priorities and the adoption of policies aligned with the SDGs, inequalities between men and women persist. Women and girls continue to face gender inequalities and gender-based violence, such as early and forced marriage, female genital mutilation, and sexual, physical, and psychological violence.

Project description

The five years (2021–2026) project “Strengthening Girls’ Capacities Through Sport and Play (RECAF-Jeu)” aims to support the empowerment of adolescent girls and young women in Ziguinchor and Sédhiou, Senegal. It is implemented by Right To Play (RTP) in close collaboration with actors from the sports sector and partners working on adolescent health and well-being.

The project aims to raise partners’ awareness of FGM/C, gender equality, and positive masculinity, and to train them in RTP’s playful approaches, tools, and methodologies. After training, partners will disseminate this knowledge within targeted communities with ongoing support from RTP. The project adopts a gender-transformative approach based on rights and the power of play/sport to help vulnerable adolescent girls and women become agents of change in their own development. This holistic approach is structured around three (3) components and works directly with marginalized adolescent girls and young women (Intermediate Outcome 1100), their respective communities—including men and boys (Intermediate Outcome 1200)—and key institutions (Intermediate Outcome 1300).

Evaluation approach and methodology

The formative evaluation of the RECAF-Jeu project, conducted from June to December 2025, focused primarily on the evaluation questions contained in the evaluation matrix, covering the project from design to implementation. In order to better understand the determinants of achieved results and obtain the maximum amount of quantitative and qualitative information, mixed methods of data collection and analysis were used among the various stakeholders involved in project implementation. This made it possible to generate statistical data and to understand the “why” behind observed behavioral changes among vulnerable adolescent girls and young women, family and community members, including men and boys.

Quantitative and qualitative data collection took place from September 26 to October 12, 2025, in the nine (9) intervention municipalities in the regions of Ziguinchor and Sédhiou. Quantitative data used to estimate the values of indicators defined in the PMF were collected through electronic questionnaire-based surveys targeting:

Qualitative data were collected through 36 focus group discussions (FGDs) with beneficiaries and 77 individual interviews with implementation partners. Individual interviews were also conducted with RTP staff at headquarters and at national and local levels.

Data processing and statistical analysis were conducted using the KoboCollect software. Overall, data analysis was based on the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criteria (relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, and impact). In addition, to better understand the determinants of achieved results and propose possible adjustments, the coherence and strategy used for project implementation were also analyzed.

Limitations of the evaluation

The main limitation of this evaluation lies in the fact that some survey data—such as the level of mastery of acquired knowledge—are based solely on respondents’ self-reported statements rather than on objective testing. As a result, some findings may be subject to bias and may not fully reflect field realities.

Key findings

Key conclusions

Key recommendations

Key lessons learned

Date modified: