Language selection

Search

Archived information

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Global Affairs Canada: Departmental Results Report 2018-19 - Supplementary Information Tables

Table of Contents

Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy

1. Context for the Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy

The 2016–2019 Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS):

In keeping with the objectives of the act to make environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable to Parliament, Global Affairs Canada supports reporting on the implementation of the FSDS and its Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy, or equivalent document, through the activities described in this supplementary information table.

2. Sustainable development in Global Affairs Canada

Global Affairs Canada’s Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy for 2017 to 2020 describes the department’s actions in support of achieving the FSDS goals on Effective Action on Climate Change and Low-Carbon Government. This supplementary information table presents available results for the departmental actions pertinent to these goals. Last year’s supplementary information table is posted on the department’s website. This year, Global Affairs Canada is also noting which UN SDG target each departmental action contributes to achieving.

3. Departmental performance by FSDS goal

The following tables provide performance information on departmental actions in support of the FSDS goals listed in section 2.

FSDS Goal: Effective Action on Climate Change

FSDS target(s): By 2030, reduce Canada’s total global greenhouse gas emissions by 30%, relative to 2005 emission levels.

FSDS contributing action(s): Take a leading role in international agreements and initiatives on climate change.

Corresponding departmental action(s): Work with Environment and Climate Change Canada to play a leadership role and provide policy and legal advice to support the negotiation and implementation of international environmental agreements and initiatives on climate change, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement.

Support for UN Sustainable Development Goal target: SDG 13

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Degree to which high quality and timely legal advice regarding Canada’s international legal obligations is considered and integrated into Government of Canada positions on environmental law in international forums.

Results achieved:

Throughout the year, GAC provided continued high quality and timely legal advice, under international law, with a view to: inform the elaboration of sound Canadian positions for international climate change negotiations; ensure legal consistency in international decisions; and ensure that Canada’s priorities and interests are well captured and preserved. This included:

Corresponding departmental action(s): Advance a progressive trade agenda, including integrating robust environment provisions in trade agreements, and supporting clean technology exports.

Support for UN Sustainable Development Goal target: SDG 13

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Degree to which environmental provisions are integrated in free trade agreements and other aspects of Canada's trade agenda.

Results achieved:

Corresponding departmental action(s): Deliver on Canada's pledge to provide $2.65 billion in climate financing to support developing countries' transition to low-carbon, climate-resilient economies, in line with Canada's feminist international assistance policy priorities.

Support for UN Sustainable Development Goal target: SDG 13

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Degree to which agreements with partners are finalized to deliver and implement $2.65 billion of climate financing by the end of FY 20/21. (Starting point: $838,700,700 delivered as of June 1, 2017)

Results achieved: As of April 2019 our number was over $1.5 billion worth of projects announced.

Corresponding departmental action(s): Integrate environmental sustainability throughout Canadian development assistance, to ensure that Canadian international investments do not result in significant adverse environmental effects, in accordance with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals.

Support for UN Sustainable Development Goal target: SDG 13

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: % of Global Affairs Canada’s development assistance initiatives that underwent an environmental analysis. (Starting point: 100%)

Results achieved: 100% of GAC’s development assistance initiatives underwent an environmental analysis.

FSDS Goal: Low-Carbon Government

FSDS target(s): Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from federal government buildings and fleets by 40% below 2005 levels by 2030, with an aspiration to achieve it by 2025.

FSDS contributing action(s): Improve the energy efficiency of our buildings/operations

Corresponding departmental action(s): N/A

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: N/A

Results achieved: N/A

FSDS contributing action(s): Modernize our fleet

Corresponding departmental action(s): Purchase two new vehicles categorized as low emission (hybrid or full electric).

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: SDG 12.7

Starting point: 42% hybrid fleet in January 2017

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Percentage of low emission vehicles in the department’s domestic fleet

Results achieved: 63%

FSDS contributing action(s): Support the transition to a low-carbon economy through green procurement

Corresponding departmental action(s): Ensure that the Global Affairs Canada procurement community receives green procurement training and continues to promote the use of green products.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: SDG 12.7

Starting point: 80%

Target: Promote public procurement practices that are sustainable, in accordance with national policies and priorities.

Performance indicator: Percentage of procurement and materiel management specialists that have completed the Canada School of Public Service green procurement course (C215).

Results achieved: 80.7% (42 of 52 of the Procurement and materiel management specialists have completed the Canada School of Public Service Green Procurement course (C215)

Corresponding departmental action(s): Implement a global printer cyclical replacement strategy, which will incorporate green procurement.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: SDG 12.7

Starting point: 2,273,038 pages in June 2016

Target: Promote public procurement practices that are sustainable, in accordance with national policies and priorities.

Performance indicator: Percentage reduction of total printed pages at Headquarters.

Results achieved:

Corresponding departmental action(s): Ensure that environmental considerations are incorporated into corporate policies, processes and practices in accordance with departmental refresh cycles.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: SDG 12.7

Starting point: 80%

Target: Promote public procurement practices that are sustainable, in accordance with national policies and priorities.

Performance indicator: Percentage of corporate policies, processes and practices that were created or updated during the fiscal year and incorporated environmental considerations.

Results achieved:

Corresponding departmental action(s): Implement a comprehensive device strategy policy, which will ensure sustainability of IT asset management, reduce evergreening costs and duplication of devices.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: SDG 12.7

Starting point: 1.21

Target: Promote public procurement practices that are sustainable, in accordance with national policies and priorities.

Performance indicator: Number of devices per employee.

Results achieved:

FSDS contributing action(s): Demonstrate innovative technologies

Corresponding departmental action(s): N/A

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: N/A

Results achieved: N/A

FSDS contributing action(s): Promote sustainable travel practices

Corresponding departmental action(s): Encourage and facilitate the use of sustainable travel practices.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Number of information sessions or communications on travel that includes guidance on sustainable travel practices.

Results achieved: N/A

Corresponding departmental action(s): Continue to operate the IntraBus shuttle service transporting staff between its three main buildings at headquarters.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: 200

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Average number of shuttle service passengers per day.

Results achieved: N/A

Starting point: $1,372,000 in 2013-14

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Percentage reduction in the cost of taxi services, as compared to pre-implementation of the shuttle service. *Estimate of funds expended on taxi rides prior to amalgamation and implementation of shuttle service; cost provides a measure of total number of hours and distance.

Results achieved: 

Corresponding departmental action(s): Work with Shared Services Canada to increase network bandwidth at missions abroad.

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: SDG 9C

Starting point: upgrades underway at 15 of the most congested sites

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: Number of missions where the bandwidth was upgraded (Starting point).

Results achieved: When the indicator was first created in 2016-2017, the Cyclical Replacement Program had not yet launched and the 1.25 figure was roughly estimated. SID is now in Year 2 of the 5-year program and has more accurate and reliable data to report on.

FSDS contributing action(s): Understand climate change impacts and build resilience

Corresponding departmental action(s): N/A

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: N/A

Results achieved: N/A

FSDS contributing action(s): Improve transparency and accountability

Corresponding departmental action(s): N/A

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: N/A

Results achieved: N/A

FSDS contributing action(s): Develop policy for low‑carbon government

Corresponding departmental action(s): N/A

Support for United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) target: N/A

Starting point: N/A

Target: N/A

Performance indicator: N/A

Results achieved: N/A

4. Report on integrating sustainable development

During the 2018-19 reporting cycle, Global Affairs Canada considered the environmental effects of proposals subject to the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals as part of its decision-making processes. Through the Strategic Environmental Assessment process, all of these departmental proposals were found to have neutral to positive effects on progress towards achieving the goals and targets of both the 2016–2019 FSDS and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Additional information on the results of Strategic Environmental Assessments is available on the Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy and Environmental Assessment of Trade Negotiations web pages.

Details on transfer payment programs of $5 million or more

Anti-Crime Capacity Building Program

Name of transfer payment program: Anti-Crime Capacity Building Program (ACCBP)

Start date: December 9, 2009

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Grants and contributions

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-12 (amended); 2015-16 (amendment)

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 31: Anti-Crime and Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building

Description : The ACCBP was created in 2009, to provide assistance to enhance the capacity of key beneficiary states, government entities and international organizations to prevent and respond to threats posed by international criminal activity to Canada and the region. Though focus remains on the Americas, the ACCBP now has a global mandate. The ACCBP has 7 thematic priorities, which include Security System Reform, Illicit Drugs, Corruption, Trafficking in Persons, Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime, Crime Prevention (including Cyber) and Migrant Smuggling. The Human Smuggling Envelope was created under the ACCBP to address the threat posed to Canadian interests by migrant smuggling, and is specifically allocated to building the capacity of local authorities to disrupt, interdict and deter migrant smuggling ventures destined for Canada.

Results achieved: Through a variety of individual projects and in cooperation with like-minded partners, ACCBP programming has made it possible to:

* ACCBP programming is targeted to address insecurity and to advance the rule of law. It is also based on potential impact to Canada in terms of the potential threat, therefore much of ACCBP programming is regional in order to heighten impact and promote regional cooperation between countries.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: None

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: The next evaluation will take place in 2020.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: The program delivers programming via Government of Canada departments and agencies plus selected multilateral institutions, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total grants9,356,4304,929,6667,250,0005,933,8795,903,297-1,346,703
Total contributions7,735,08411,085,5955,601,78210,310,09410,310,0944,708,312
Total program 17,091,51416,015,26112,851,78216,243,97316,213,3913,361,609
Explanation of variancesThe Global Envelope of the ACCBP was able to program 96% of funds. The Human Smuggling Envelope, under the ACCBP, due to the delay in renewal, the uncertainty surrounding the availability of funds, and changes in staffing, was unable to achieve the same result. The variance between planned and actual spending is due largely to a conversion from Grants to Contributions in the amount of $2,829,736.00. Actual spending was also higher than planned as a result of issuing a payment in fiscal year 2018-19 that was previously planned for fiscal year 2019-20.

Canada Fund for Local Initiatives

Name of transfer payment program: Canada Fund for Local Initiatives (CFLI)

Start date: April 1, 2012

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory:

Program 27. Humanitarian Assistance

Program 33. Canada Fund for Local Initiatives (CFLI)

Description: The Canada Fund for Local Initiatives (CFLI) is a contribution program delivered through Canadian embassies and high commissions that supports small-scale, high-impact projects in developing countries. The objectives of the program are to contribute to the achievement of Canada’s thematic priorities for international assistance; assist in the advocacy of Canadian values and interests; and strengthen Canada’s bilateral relations with foreign countries and their civil societies. The program also provides small-scale financing to local organizations to respond to natural disasters and humanitarian emergencies. The average contribution is $26,000. Projects are largely conceived and implemented by local organizations, making them highly responsive to local needs.

Results achieved: Increased access to, and influence with, key local decision makers by Canadian mission staff to raise awareness and promote Canada’s values and interests

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: By program design, the CFLI is intended to respond to local needs and engage closely with recipients, many of whom are small organizations with modest resources. Applicants are solicited mainly through broad calls for proposals, which clearly identify a contact person who is responsible for responding to queries. Many Canadian high commissions and embassies hold information sessions for interested applicants. Once projects are selected for funding, recipients and mission personnel communicate frequently throughout the implementation and reporting process. Mission personnel often visit project sites to monitor projects. Additionally, recipients may be offered the opportunity to participate in group experience-sharing workshops or training, including on financial reporting and record keeping.

Financial information (dollars)
ProgramType of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
27. Humanitarian AssistanceTotal contributions0019,400,00019,400,0000-19,400,000
Total Program0019,400,00019,400,0000-19,400,000
33. Canada Fund for Local InitiativesTotal contributions14,477,76414,752,19614,700,00014,700,00014,482,091-217,909
Total Program14,477,76414,752,19614,700,00014,700,00014,482,091-217,909
Total 14,477,76414,752,19634,100,00034,100,00014,482,09119,617,909
Explanation of variancesSince 2012, the CFLI program has had ongoing authority to disburse up to $20 million in Vote 10 funds per fiscal year, with a current budget of $14.7 million. In addition, the Crisis Pool Quick Release Mechanism funds are included in CFLI’s planned spending. The variance between planned spending and actual spending is primarily attributable to the unused portion of funds related to the Crisis Pool Quick Release Mechanism ($19.4 million). The remaining variance ($217,909) was due to end-of-year adjustments to individual CFLI projects and currency fluctuations. Overall, 98.6% of CFLI funds were spent.

CanExport Program

Name of transfer payment program: CanExport Program

Start date: December 11, 2008

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Grants and Contributions

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2008-2009 (updated 2013-2014 to add the Foreign Trade Zones Marketing Program [FTZ-MP], 2015-2016 to add the CanExport Program, 2017-2018 amendments to program terms and conditions including name change of program from Global Markets Support Program to Trade and Investment Support Program, 2018-2019 additional funding ($50 million over 5 years) in response to Budget 2018 to increase Trade Diversification, and 2019-2020 additional funding (100 million over 5 years) in response to the Fall Economic Statement, changes to Program Terms and Conditions and name change of program from Trade and Investment Support Program to CanExport Program)

Link to the department’s Program Inventory:

Program 20. International Business Development

Program 21. International Innovation and Investment

Description: The CanExport Program harmonizes four pillars under one umbrella mechanism comprising the following:

The objective of the program is to build a stronger and more effective Canadian capacity to compete in the global economy. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved: CanExport SMEs' final reports for projects completed in 2018-2019 show that, at the time of completion and as a direct result of their project, 29% of companies had achieved varying degrees of success; 18% had achieved an intermediate outcome; and another 15% had been able to achieve export sales in a new market totalling $93,825,000. 

Results achieved from CanExport funded activities for community investments and associations contribute to a stronger Canadian capacity to compete in the global economy. Questionnaire responses provided evidence that 100% of communities reported having improved ability to better service prospective investors, 92% of associations reported that there are more Canadian companies involved in international business as a result of funded projects, and 85% of associations reported that the funded projects resulted in foreign sales or contracts. Additionally, questionnaire responses revealed further evidence of ongoing generation of foreign direct investment, and creation or retention of jobs.

CanExport Innovation aggregated data obtained through recipient’s final reports from projects approved and/or completed in 2018-2019 show that 73% of recipients significantly increased their knowledge of R&D opportunities in foreign markets. Recipients reported meeting a total of 1,095 foreign contacts, which has resulted in 46 strong opportunities pursued, as evidenced by the signing of non-disclosure agreements, letters of intent, confidential disclosure agreements, and memorandums of understanding (54% of completed projects) and 33 signed Research & Development partnership agreements worth over $8.6 million (39% of completed projects). In fiscal year 2018-2019, CanExport Innovation approved $1.1 million in funding, representing a return on investment of approximately 8:1.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: None (note the Evaluations planned for 2018-19 and 2019-20 have been rescheduled to take place in fiscal year 2020-2021).

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: The CanExport Program administers an annual recipient questionnaire, allowing recipients to provide direct feedback to program management. Although the questionnaire does not cover CanExport SMEs, final reports and annual snapshots are submitted by CanExport SMEs recipients to provide feedback and data on the results associated with their individual projects. The CanExport Program also seeks feedback from applicants and recipients through proactive outreach and through ongoing communications related to program delivery.

Financial information (dollars)
ProgramType of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
20. International Business DevelopmentTotal contributions11,911,41912,312,25913,275,00013,275,00012,581,901-693,099
Total Program11,911,41912,312,25913,275,00013,275,00012,581,901-693,099
21. International Innovation and InvestmentTotal contributions3,850,4923,980,0683,762,3634,927,7314,067,233304,870
Total Program3,850,4933,980,0693,762,3634,927,7314,067,233304,870
Total 15,761,91216,292,32817,037,36318,202,73116,649,134-388,229
Explanation of variancesProjects funded by CanExport pillars are approved based on estimates; however, actual expenditures were lower in some cases. Actual spending for 2018–19 also included outstanding payable year-end payments; therefore, total spending for 2018–19 may be lower than reported in the above table.

Commonwealth Secretariat

Name of transfer payment program: Commonwealth Secretariat

Start date: September 28, 1965

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2006-2007

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s assessed contribution to the regular budget of the Commonwealth is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of Canada’s membership is to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy goals related to international peace, security and development with a view to enhancing relationships among the 53 Commonwealth member countries. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: No audits have been conducted or are planned by Global Affairs Canada. The Commonwealth Secretariat’s Board of Governors, comprising representatives from member states, including Canada, receives an external annual audit report and acts on any opinions therein. The Audit Committee also follows the work of the Commonwealth Secretariat in General and commissions internal audits if required.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: No evaluation has been conducted by Global Affairs Canada. The Commonwealth Secretariat began a mid-term review of its Strategic Plan 2017-18 to 2020-21 in fiscal year 2018-19, and the results are pending.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: Engagement is ongoing. For more details, visit The Commonwealth website.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions4,531,8234,398,7984,728,9745,077,2045,077,204348,230
Total program 4,531,8234,398,7984,728,9745,077,2045,077,204348,230
Explanation of variancesVariances between planned and actual amounts reflect fluctuating exchange rates, as Commonwealth invoices are issued in pounds sterling. The Audit Committee also follows the work of the Commonwealth Secretariat in General and commissions internal audits if required.

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization

Name of transfer payment program: Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO)

Start date: February 1998

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: December 2011 – extended indefinitely by the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 17. Peace and Security Policy

Description: To pay Canada’s assessed contribution to the CTBTO, which is responsible for provisionally implementing the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: CTBTO audits are shared with CTBTO’s State Signatories, they are not available to the general public. Therefore, there was no audit in 2018-19 that can be reported for CTBTO.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: CTBTO evaluations are shared with CTBTO’s State Signatories, they are not available to the general public. Therefore, there was no evaluation in 2018-19 that can be reported for CTBTO.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions4,531,8234,398,7984,728,9745,077,2045,077,204348,230
Total program 4,531,8234,398,7984,728,9745,077,2045,077,204348,230
Explanation of variancesFunding received in the Supplementary Estimates exercise ($109K) as well as internal reallocation between assessed contributions surpluses of $239K, to cover for foreign currency fluctuations (US $ & Euro).

Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program

Name of transfer payment program: Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program (CTCBP)

Start date: September 2005

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Grants and contributions

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012 (amended); 2015-2016 (amended)

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 31. Anti-Crime and Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building

Description: CTCBP aims to reduce security threats from terrorism for Canadians and affected populations, particularly women and girls, in countries where Canada engages. CTCBP provides training, equipment, infrastructure and technical assistance to enhance the capacity of beneficiary states, government entities and international organizations to prevent and respond to threats posed by terrorist activity.

CTCBP focuses on countering violent extremism and foreign terrorist fighters, combating the financing of terrorism, preventing violent extremism and critical infrastructure security.

Results achieved : Programming in CTCBP focus countries is fraught with difficulties and results can appear limited and volatile. This is reflected in the fact that these countries are not only exposed to terrorist threats, but to conditions of fragility in general. Six of CTCBP’s programming countries feature among the ten most at-risk countries both on the Global Terrorism Index and on the Fragile States Index. Quantifying results of specific CTCBP programing efforts can prove to be of limited value in such unpredictable country contexts.

However, through individual projects (several of which are of a classified nature) and in cooperation with like-minded partners it has been possible to:

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: There were no program evaluations conducted during the reporting period, however a corporate program evaluation is expected to take place in 2020.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: CTCBP delivers programming via Government of Canada departments and agencies, selected multilateral institutions, foreign governments, non-governmental organizations and private entities. During the reporting period, emphasis has been placed on encouraging other government departments to provide gender analysis in proposals and subsequent programming.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total grants7,920,5798,642,12313,970,00031,043,1419,197,273-4,772,727
Total contributions40,158,07027,077,5718,518,06548,272,33648,272,33639,754,271
Total program 48,078,64935,719,69422,488,06579,315,47757,469,60934,981,544
Explanation of variancesThe main reason for the increase in spending is due to in year funding received for DND-Op Impact projects of $32,074,010 and additional funding through internal reallocation for the Middle East Strategy.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 

Name of transfer payment program: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Start date: 1945

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to the FAO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy goals related to agricultural development and to provide Canada with a voice in the international community. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

For further details, please refer to FAO’s latest available Programme Implementation Report, which informs Member States about the work carried out and the results achieved by the Organization during the 2016-2017 biennium, including reporting on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-based indicators of progress on achieving the organization’s strategic objectives in alignment with Agenda 2030 and towards more accountable and transparent multilateral action.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The FAO Director-General and the Finance Committee conducted its 2018 Annual Report. The findings can be found here.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions18,686,62218,462,60017,989,55018,860,44618,860,446870,896
Total program 18,686,62218,462,60017,989,55018,860,44618,860,446870,896
Explanation of variancesAssessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Member States, including Canada, are legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. Currency fluctuations are also a factor.

Grants and Contributions in Aid of Academic Relations

Name of transfer payment program: Grants and Contributions in Aid of Academic Relations

Start date: January 1, 1989

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Grants and contributions

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2017-2018

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 20. International Business Development

Description: These grants and contributions expand international education programs to more effectively and efficiently advance departmental priorities, which include contributing to Canada’s competitiveness in the education sector and promoting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. Recipients are not required to repay grant funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved : Raised awareness of Canada among future leaders, decision makers and the general public in foreign countries, as measured by:

Canada’s knowledge advantage was recognized worldwide and serves to strengthen Canadian interests and economic prosperity, as measured by:

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: There was no audit completed in 2018-19.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: A departmental evaluation of Canada’s International Education Strategy was completed in February 2019. This evaluation included a review of how the Strategy leverages scholarship programs through Grants and Contributions in Aid of Academic Relations. The evaluation had two findings related to scholarships: a) While the International Scholarships Program (ISP) is an effective tool to support the IES objectives in Latin America and the Caribbean, gaps exist in Global Affairs Canada’s scholarship offer; b) Global Affairs’ scholarships programs also contribute to results and coherence across departmental business lines.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19:

The following took place in 2018–19: promotion of programs by 55 missions; weekly collaborations with non-governmental organizations; and participation in four education conferences and forums, one study tour, and one collaboration mission involving leaders of international academic institutions from the Americas coming to Canada.

International scholarships news releases - RSS feeds: 30

Alumni newsletters published in 2018-19: 1

International scholarships website statistics:

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total grants1,045,3411,558,6002,530,0001,820,7611,820,761-709,239
Total contributions6,131,5785,827,1474,587,6276,278,0666,278,0661,690,439
Total program 7,176,9197,385,7477,117,6278,098,8278,098,827981,200
Explanation of variancesThe variance between planned and actual spending in 2018–19 was related to the identification of additional funding from elsewhere in the Department that was provided to support approved but unfunded academic relations activities. Most of the funding was originally provided as grants, but since the majority of activities were more applicable to the characteristics of contributions, some grants were converted to contributions.

Grants in Lieu of Taxes on Diplomatic, Consular and International Organizations’ Property in Canada 

Name of transfer payment program: Grants in Lieu of Taxes on Diplomatic, Consular and International Organizations’ Property in Canada

Start date: January 18, 1979

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Grants

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 1978-1979

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 5. Diplomatic Services and Protocol

Description: The Diplomatic, Consular and International Organizations’ Property Grants Order (P.C.1979-59, January 18, 1979), the Municipal Grants Act, and successor orders and acts form the statutory basis of this program. Public Services and Procurement Canada, and the National Capital Commission establishes responsibilities and procedures governing the provision of services related to the payment of grants in lieu of real property and frontage or area taxes with respect to diplomatic and consular property. These procedures are designed to ensure fiscal and operational accountability while promoting efficient program delivery.

Results achieved : Canada’s international obligations were met, as demonstrated by:

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total grants15,982,86013,523,93415,854,00013,803,64213,803,642-2,050,358
Total program 15,982,86013,523,93415,854,00013,803,64213,803,642-2,050,358
Explanation of variancesThe variance between the planned and actual spending is due to lower than anticipated municipal realty taxes, in addition to changes in the volume and entitlements of grants.

International Atomic Energy Agency 

Name of transfer payment program: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Start date: December 19, 1989

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 17. Peace and Security Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to the IAEA is a legally binding obligation of membership. Payment is made to ensure that membership is in good standing and to maintain influence and credibility in a key international body, the aims of which Canada supports. The IAEA is the world’s global centre of cooperation in the nuclear field and it works to further the safe, secure, and safeguarded peaceful use of nuclear technology, in particular by verifying that states adhere to their commitments to use nuclear energy only for peaceful purposes. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: IAEA audits are not made public, so it is not possible to report their findings.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: IAEA assessments are not made public, so it is not possible to communicate their conclusions.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions14,475,11515,666,57715,299,40115,700,61015,700,610401,209
Total program 14,475,11515,666,57715,299,40115,700,61015,700,610401,209
Explanation of variancesAssessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Canada is legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. Contributions to the IAEA are assessed partially in euros and partially in U.S. dollars. As a result, regular currency fluctuations change the value of these contributions as expressed in Canadian dollars and result in variances between planned and actual spending. Canada must pay its assessed contributions in full, and depending on currency fluctuations this can be more or less than the planned amounts.

International Criminal Court

Name of transfer payment program: International Criminal Court (ICC)

Start date: April 1, 2005

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2017-2018

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 4. International Law

Description: The ICC is the first permanent, treaty-based, international criminal court established to help end impunity for the perpetrators of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community. The Court’s expenses are funded primarily by assessed contributions from states parties. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved : Two additional cases have been brought before the Court. The Court also issued various decisions on preliminary examinations, trials and appeals, notably the acquittal of Gbagbo and Blé Goudé, a decision on the Prosecutor’s request to proceed with an investigation into the situation in Afghanistan, and an Appeals Chamber’s judgement in the Jordan referral regarding head of state immunity.

The Office of the Prosecutor has opened preliminary examinations into alleged crimes committed against the Rohingya population in Myanmar/Bangladesh, as well as alleged crimes committed in Venezuela.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: Canada is an active participant in the ICC’s annual Assembly of States Parties (ASP) and on the Committee on Budget and Finance. The Embassy of Canada to the Netherlands is in regular direct contact with Court officials and, together with the Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations in New York, participates in working groups dealing with governance and finance issues affecting the Court. Canada, together with the six other largest contributors to the ICC’s budget, continues to press for further budget efficiencies.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions9,944,74111,146,73213,133,05213,351,72910,858,559-2,274,493
Total program 9,944,74111,146,73213,133,05213,351,72910,858,559-2,274,493
Explanation of variancesThe ICC’s annual program budget is approved by the ASP in December of the preceding year. For financial planning purposes, Canada is required to estimate the ICC program budget well in advance of its adoption. Unanticipated events, such as the arrest of an individual on a long-outstanding warrant, can result in significant increases to the Court’s budget. As a result, there is always some variance between the anticipated contribution and the assessed contribution. There may also be currency fluctuations. 

International Development Assistance

Name of transfer payment program: International Development Assistance

Start date: 2001-2002

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Grants and contributions

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2012-13

Link to the department’s Program Inventory:

Program 1. International Policy Coordination

Program 27. Humanitarian Assistance

Program 28. Partnerships and Development Innovation

Program 29. Multilateral International Assistance

Program 30. Peace and Stabilization Operations

Program 34. Europe, Arctic, Middle East and Maghreb International Assistance

Program 35. Americas International Assistance

Program 36. Asia Pacific International Assistance

Program 37. Sub-Saharan Africa International Assistance

Description: Official development assistance (ODA) activities contribute to poverty reduction, take into account the perspectives of the poor, and are consistent with international human rights standards, as per the Official Development Assistance Accountability Act (the Act). ODA may also be provided for the purposes of alleviating the effects of a natural or man-made disaster or other emergency occurring outside Canada. Global Affairs Canada is the lead department responsible for Canada's ODA. The majority of the Department’s international assistance activities meet the requirements of the Act. However, Global Affairs Canada’s transfer payment program does not preclude activities falling outside the scope of the Act. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved: In 2018-19, Global Affairs Canada continued to support Canada’s engagement in developing countries. Canadian development projects focused on achieving results within four thematic sub-programs: Sustainable Economic Growth; Children and Youth, including Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH); Food Security; and Multisector Assistance, Social Development and Development Engagement. In 2018-19, Canada’s humanitarian assistance worked to reduce suffering and save lives in populations experiencing humanitarian crises through its policy dialogue, advocacy and humanitarian programming, including institutional support to key humanitarian partners. Please consult Core Responsibility 3 of the Departmental Results Report for more information on Global Affairs Canada’s international development programs and performance results.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: Audit of repayable contributions – September 2018

The audit team found that the Government’s strategic direction was reflected into the repayable contribution arrangements. However, the Department did not define a policy and programming strategy at the departmental level to manage its growing portfolio of arrangements. The Department has demonstrated progress in clarifying roles and responsibilities by creating the Office of Innovative Finance that supports Programs’ programming of repayable contributions and term sheets defining respective roles and responsibilities. However, there are areas where roles and responsibilities are still not formally defined, especially after arrangements have been signed.

The audit team found that, at the initiative level, the Department has exercised due diligence for managing risks associated with repayable contributions, in compliance with applicable government policies. However, the Department did not have a tailored risk management framework for its repayable contribution portfolio. This will be especially important given the Budget 2018 announcement of an additional $1.5 billion in concessional funding over five years to support innovation in Canada’s international assistance.

The audit team found that Global Affairs Canada is exercising oversight over repayable contributions through different means that vary based on the type of funding arrangement. The Office of Innovative Finance and Programs has developed tools to monitor the implementation of the arrangements, such as performance and financial status. The Department receives performance information for each arrangement. However, the format of project results presentation does not always facilitate progress review against indicators. Nevertheless, the audit team found improvement in the most recent performance reporting from recipients. Finally, the audit team found that the Department did not yet have formal business processes to manage repayments.

Grants and Contribution Monitoring and Oversight - planned for 2019

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Initiative evaluation approved in May 2019.

Since 2010, Canada has played a key leadership role in global action to end the preventable deaths of mothers, newborns and children. Canada’s Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Initiative* is a ten year (2010/11 to 2020) 6.5 billion dollar commitment aimed at improving the health of women and children in the world’s most vulnerable regions. This represents a significant amount of international assistance resources spanning numerous geographic regions and functional areas.  

This evaluation of the MNCH Initiative assessed the relevance, effectiveness, sustainability, and efficiency of programming in order to inform decision-making and to support policy and program improvements. The evaluation focused on a sample of 73 projects out of a total of 987 projects associated with the Initiative that were funded by Global Affairs Canada from 2010/11 to 2017/18. The sample accounted for 43% of total MNCH funding during the evaluation period.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: Please refer to Core Responsibility 3 of the Departmental Results Report 2017–18.

Financial information (dollars)
ProgramType of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
1. International Policy CoordinationTotal grants000000
Total contributions0081,94500-81,945
Total Program0081,94500-81,945
3. Multilateral PolicyTotal grants000000
Total contributions000000
Total Program000000
4. International LawTotal grants85,69991,9710106,984100,000100,000
Total contributions000000
Total Program85,69991,9710106,984100,000100,000
27. Humanitarian AssistanceTotal grants709,551,679761,475,737609,679,828985,545,477827,954,058218,274,230
Total contributions7,453,8377,729,61208,901,3648,645,9448,645,944
Total Program717,005,516769,205,350609,679,828994,446,841836,600,002226,920,174
28. Partnerships and Development InnovationTotal grants17,711,27119,007,35818,904,11120,666,73820,666,7381,762,627
Total contributions263,667,308273,422,403218,782,226305,836,135305,836,13587,053,909
Total Program281,378,579292,429,762237,686,337326,502,873326,502,87388,816,536
29. Multilateral International AssistanceTotal grants745,777,238800,352,236739,009,430870,224,551870,224,551131,215,121
Total contributions203,419,978210,946,058224,533,081235,953,332235,953,33211,420,251
Total Program949,197,2171,011,298,294963,542,5111,106,177,8831,106,177,883142,635,372
30. Peace and Stabilization OperationsTotal grants002,705,69300-2,705,693
Total contributions000000
Total Program002,705,69300-2,705,693
32. WMD Threat ReductionTotal grants6,698,4047,188,58508,362,0337,816,1627,816,162
Total contributions000000
Total Program6,698,4047,188,58508,362,0337,816,1627,816,162
34. Europe, Middle East and Maghreb International AssistanceTotal grants72,154,20377,434,353132,852,55084,194,52384,194,523-48,658,027
Total contributions98,874,766102,532,90940,141,752114,688,000114,688,00074,546,248
Total Program171,028,969179,967,262172,994,302198,882,523198,882,52325,888,221
35. Americas International AssistanceTotal grants91,108,05297,775,219175,822,282106,311,187106,311,187-69,511,095
Total contributions107,863,436111,854,139121,487,320125,114,245125,114,2453,626,925
Total Program198,971,487209,629,358297,309,602231,425,432231,425,432-65,884,170
36. Asia Pacific International AssistanceTotal grants177,584,044190,579,411203,970,632207,217,366207,217,3663,246,734
Total contributions84,235,36987,351,88871,548,10497,707,29697,707,29626,159,192
Total Program261,819,413277,931,298275,518,736304,924,662304,924,66229,405,926
37. Sub-Saharan Africa International AssistanceTotal grants119,923,775128,699,639473,228,993139,935,369139,935,369-333,293,624
Total contributions410,933,644426,137,261276,475,597516,712,823476,655,063200,179,466
Total Program530,857,419554,836,900749,704,590656,648,192616,590,432-133,114,158
Total Grants1,940,594,3652,082,604,5092,356,173,5192,422,564,2282,264,419,954-91,753,565
Total Contributions1,176,448,3391,219,974,270953,050,0251,404,913,1951,364,600,015411,549,990
Total3,117,042,7043,302,578,7793,309,223,5443,827,477,4233,629,019,969319,796,425
Explanation of variances

International Policy Coordination

  • Actual spending was $0.1 million lower than planned spending. The variance is attributable to a transfer of resources to other international development assistance (IDA) programs.

International Law

  • Actual spending was $0.1 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding realigned within the IDA programs.

Humanitarian Assistance

  • Actual spending was $226.9 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received through the 2018-19 Supplementary Estimates to support the implementation of the Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP) as well as funding received to support Canada’s commitment under the Food Assistance Convention.

Partnerships and Development Innovation

  • Actual spending was $88.8 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received through the 2018-19 Supplementary Estimates to support the implementation of FIAP as well as funding realigned from other IDA programs.

Multilateral International Assistance

  • Actual spending was $142.6 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received from other IDA programs to support the implementation of FIAP.

Peace and Stabilization Operations

  • Actual spending was $2.7 million lower than planned spending. The variance is attributable to a transfer of resources to other IDA programs.

WMD Threat Reduction

  • Actual spending was $7.8 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding realigned within the IDA programs.

Europe, Middle East and Maghreb International Assistance

  • Actual spending was $25.9 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received to support the implementation of FIAP as well as funding realigned from other IDA programs.

Americas International Assistance

  • Actual spending was $65.9 million lower than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received to provide humanitarian assistance in response to major international crisis. These increases were offset by realignment to other IDA programs.

Asia Pacific International Assistance

  • Actual spending was $29.4 million higher than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received to provide humanitarian assistance in response to major international crisis.

Sub-Saharan Africa International Assistance

  • Actual spending was $133.1 million lower than planned spending. The variance is attributable to funding received to support the implementation of FIAP. These increases were offset by realignment to other IDA programs.

International Financial Institutions

Name of transfer payment program: International Financial Institutions (IFI)

Start date: N/A

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Statutory Authority (Payments to International Financial Institutions – Direct payments)

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: N/A

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 29. Multilateral International Assistance

Description: International financial institutions such as the regional development banks (RDBs) (including the African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the Caribbean Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank, which are under Global Affairs Canada’s responsibility) provide financial services and focus on regional and country-specific development solutions. The IFI program also includes authorities for cash payments made to the concessional funds of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol (MFMP) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Payments to IFIs are made in accordance with sections 3(a), 3(c) and section 12 of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act. These include direct payment to the institutions to enable the IFIs to finance their concessional funding windows for assistance to the poorest developing countries and the purchase of shares of the institutions. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The IFIs regularly conduct audits of their programming that are shared with Global Affairs Canada in its capacity as shareholder and member of the governing body of these institutions.

No audits were planned for the GEF or MFMP in 2018-19.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: The recipients of IFIs programming are mostly developing country governments, which must request the programming. The RDBs work closely with the governments to ensure that their programming is in line with each government’s development priorities and that project beneficiaries are consulted in the design of the project. All IFIs have in place environment and social safeguard policies to reduce and mitigate negative environmental and social consequences of the projects.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Other transfer payments240,772,641232,251,950232,491,748250,380,451250,380,45117,888,703
Total program 240,772,641232,251,950232,491,748250,380,451250,380,45117,888,703
Explanation of variancesThe variance occurred because funding decisions were made under the IFI Act to increase contributions to the International Fund for Agricultural Development, the Multilateral Investment Fund and the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol. These increased contributions were funded through Supplementary Estimates B. 

International Labour Organization

Name of transfer payment program: International Labour Organization (ILO)

Start date: The ILO was founded in 1919, and Canada has been a member since inception.

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to the ILO, a UN specialized agency, is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy goals related to international labour and social policy issues and provide it with a voice in the international community. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

The ILO’s Programme Budget, which sets out the strategic objectives and expected outcomes for the organization’s work, is approved every two years by the International Labour Conference. For additional details on results and plans, please consult: ILO Programme and Budget 2020-2021.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The ILO has an external auditor and provides regular audited financial statements.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions14,835,87714,398,84814,378,22414,000,47714,000,477-377,747
Total program 14,835,87714,398,84814,378,22414,000,47714,000,477-377,747
Explanation of variancesAssessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Member States, including Canada, are legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. Currency fluctuations are also a factor.

International Organisation of La Francophonie

Name of transfer payment program: International Organisation of La Francophonie (IOF)

Start date: March 9, 1972

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s assessed contribution to the regular budget of the IOF is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of Canada’s membership is to promote Canadian values (e.g. cultural and linguistic diversity, democracy, human rights, and good governance) and interests; to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy objectives related to international peace, security, development and prosperity; and to enhance relationships among the 83 other La Francophonie states and governments. The IOF may be required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: Every year, the administrator of the OIF presents a review of the organization and its programming activities to the OIF’s members. Programming achievements for 2018–19 will be presented in fall 2019 as part of the OIF’s annual report on progress for its 2015–18 programming.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions16,813,96315,278,12115,392,09515,352,85115,352,851-39,244
Total program16,813,96315,278,12115,392,09515,352,85115,352,851-39,244
Explanation of variancesPlanned spending for 2018–19 represents part of the amounts anticipated to be paid to the OIF in 2018 and 2019. The actual spending amount represents the payments made in 2018–19, which consist of the second and final portion of Canada’s statutory payment to the OIF for 2018 and the first portion of the statutory payment to the OIF for 2019. Another factor explaining the difference between planned and actual spending is the difference in the exchange rate at the time the planned amount in euros was calculated in Canadian dollars and the time payments were actually made. Between 2016 and 2019, assessed contributions have been rising annually by 1.5%.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Civil Administration

Name of transfer payment program:North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Civil Administration

Start date: January 1, 1989

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012 (amended)

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 17. Peace and Security Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to NATO flows from its membership in NATO under the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty. Canada’s contribution furthers its foreign policy goals by funding the administrative budget of NATO, an international organization vital to Canadian defence and security interests. NATO was founded to promote the stability of the Euro-Atlantic area and to safeguard the freedom and security of its people based on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and international law. NATO accounts are subject to annual audit by the International Board of Auditors (IBAN) for NATO. From 2014 to 2018, through a voluntary national contribution (VNC), Canada had a representative on the IBAN for a four-year period. Canada has contributed a different VNC to the IBAN since Aug 2019. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program. In practice, any surplus funds are credited to the following year.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions24,914,55825,615,62225,246,57325,669,38124,883,679-362,894
Total program 24,914,55825,615,62225,246,57325,669,38124,883,679-362,894
Explanation of variancesExchange rate fluctuations continue to have a significant impact on the actual spending versus the planned spending. Also, the 2017-18 actual spending was higher than expected due to changes in the NATO Civil Budget.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 

Name of transfer payment program:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

Start date: March 20, 1975

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011–12 (amended)

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 2. Trade, Investment and International Economic Policy

Description: The mission of the OECD is to develop and promote evidence-based policies and standards that will improve the economic and social well-being of its member countries and people around the world. The OECD works primarily with governments to understand what drives economic, social and environmental change, measures productivity and global flows of trade and investment, analyzes and compares data to predict future trends, and sets international standards on a wide range of areas, from agriculture and tax to the safety of chemicals. The OECD’s biennial planning and budgeting, are governed by an outputs-based management framework, delivered through a Programme of Work and Budget, which is approved by members, based on their priorities. Outputs are tracked by the Secretariat and each of the OECD’s committees, whose members assess the activities’ quality and impact through the Programme Implementation Report, with a view to improving performance. Impact effectiveness and efficiency of committees are also assessed through in-depth evaluations on a five-year basis. Financial operations and expenditures are externally audited annually and reported to members; external auditors also undertake performance audits.

Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19:Financial audits are performed annually by external auditors, and the reports are reviewed by members through the Audit Committee, the Budget Committee and the Council. Performance audits are performed annually by both internal and external auditors; the reports are reviewed by the Audit Committee and subsequently provided to members. Executive summaries are available on the OECD website. For more information, see OECD Internal Audit and Evaluation.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: Evaluations of OECD committees are performed annually, based on a five-year cycle, by internal evaluators, and the reports are reviewed by members through both the Evaluation Committee and the Executive Committee. For more information, see the OECD Internal Audit and Evaluation.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions13,970,17214,747,48614,109,05414,131,24214,131,24222,188
Total program13,970,17214,747,48614,109,05414,131,24214,131,24222,188
Explanation of variancesPlanned amounts are based on the previous year’s assessed contribution, increased by a small amount to reflect inflation in France (the OECD is based in Paris), and are calculated in euros. Canada’s share of the OECD’s budget changes annually, as it is based on a formula that takes into account a country’s three-year average GDP and population statistics. Variances also occur because the exchange rate for the euro fluctuates and because the end of the fiscal year differs from the due date for the assessed contributions.

Organization of American States

Name of transfer payment program: Organization of American States (OAS)

Start date: May 31, 1990

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011–12

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 7. Americas Policy & Diplomacy

Description: The OAS was established in order to achieve among its member states an order of peace and justice, to promote their solidarity, to strengthen their collaboration, and to defend their sovereignty, their territorial integrity, and their independence. The OAS is composed of 35 member states (34 are active members) of the Americas and constitutes the main political, juridical, and social governmental forum in the hemisphere. In addition, it has granted permanent observer status to 69 states, as well as to the European Union. The OAS’s four pillars are well aligned with Canada’s priorities in the Americas: democracy, human rights, security, and development. Based in Washington, D.C., the OAS is a key multilateral venue for pursuing Canadian interests in the Americas. More than just a political forum, the OAS plays a valuable role in the development of common policies and norms for the hemisphere.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: Canada maintains a Permanent Mission to the OAS, headed by an ambassador and permanent representative to the OAS, in Washington, D.C.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions11,535,39810,138,17411,158,89110,838,19510,838,195-320,696
Total program11,535,39810,138,17411,158,89110,838,19510,838,195-320,696
Explanation of variancesThe variance is attributed to Canada’s regular fund quota assessment for the year and to U.S. dollar exchange rates at the time of payment. Canada’s regular fund quota assessment was 9.801 % of the OAS regular budget for the 2018 and 2019 calendar years.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 

Name of transfer payment program: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)

Start date: January 1, 1993

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2012-2013

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 17. Peace and Security Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to the OSCE is an obligation arising from its membership in what has become the world’s largest regional security organization, with 57 participating states from North America, Europe and Eurasia. Canada’s contribution furthers its foreign policy goals related to human rights, fundamental freedoms, democratization, fragile states, conflict prevention, crisis management, mediation, post-conflict development, and arms control. This is achieved by funding OSCE operations; Permanent Council meetings and working groups; policy conferences and expert workshops; and on-the-ground mediation, social betterment, and capacity-building programs implemented by the OSCE Secretariat, autonomous institutions, and field missions.

Canada’s OSCE contributions also include payments made to administer and implement two legally binding conventional arms control regimes to which Canada is state party: the Treaty on Open Skies (for which Canada is a treaty co-depository, together with Hungary) and the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, as well as the politically binding Vienna Document. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The financial report and statements are audited annually by the external auditors; the Court of Audit of Spain has done this for the last 4 years, including for 2018. It delivered an Unqualified Audit Opinion on the financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2018. The French Court des Comptes has been appointed as the external auditors for the next three years. The OSCE Office of Internal Oversight conducts a number of internal audits and evaluations each year and provides a summary report to participating States.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: The OSCE Office of Internal Oversight conducts a number of internal audits and evaluations each year and provides a summary report to participating States. Canada did not participate in any evaluations in 2018-19.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions20,289,81318,312,76318,809,55418,892,58717,492,046-1,317,508
Total program20,289,81318,312,76318,809,55418,892,58717,492,046-1,317,508
Explanation of variancesNew scales of contribution were expected to be agreed on for 2018-2019, which would have included increases for Canada. The new scales were blocked by other States, leading to a roll-over of previous scales. This, combined with currency fluctuations, explains the variances.

Pan-American Health Organization

Name of transfer payment program: Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)

Start date: July 2008

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Assessed contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2013-14

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 7. Americas Policy & Diplomacy

Description: Objective: Comply with the obligation of Canada, as a member state of PAHO, to provide funding for the Organization to advance its public health work in the Americas. The program enables Canada to protect the health of Canadians by advancing global and regional health and foreign policy priorities, and by contributing to the security of the Americas region.

Intervention Method(s): Membership in PAHO enables Canada to: 1) Protect the health of Canadians; 2) Advance Canada’s health and international assistance priorities through effective and timely management of health emergencies and outbreaks in the region; 3) Collaborate on the development of guidelines and sharing of health information and public health intelligence; and 4) Build capacity in the Americas region to uphold international norms and standards through comparative policy analysis, collaboration, and sharing of best practices.

Repayable Contributions: No

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: N/A

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: As a member of PAHO, Canada sits on the Directing Council as a voting member, thereby influencing the direction of PAHO’s work, as well as the use of its budgets. Following the 56th Directing Council in 2018, Canada was asked to chair the 164th Executive Committee for a term, from September 2018 to October 2019. The Executive Committee is composed of nine member states of the Organization (elected for three-year terms). In 2017, Canada started a three-year term on PAHO’s Executive Committee.

Canada also actively participates in a number of working groups, including the development of PAHO’s Strategic Plan 2020-25.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions13,781,62712,399,67213,632,63914,141,71912,627,756-1,004,883
Total program13,781,62712,399,67213,632,63914,141,71912,627,756-1,004,883
Explanation of variancesCanada’s annual assessed contribution for PAHO is calculated in U.S. dollars and disbursed in Canadian funds. Variances between planned and actual spending are related to fluctuating currency exchange rates.

Peace and Stabilization Operations Program

Name of transfer payment program: Peace and Stabilization Operations Program (PSOPs)

Start date: 2016

End date: Ongoing policy and funding authorities received in 2018.

Type of transfer payment: Grants and contributions

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions:  2018–2019

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 30. Peace and Stabilization Operations

Description: The Peace and Stabilization Operations Program (PSOPs) is the Government of Canada’s principal platform for conflict prevention, stabilization and peacebuilding. It engages in fragile and conflict-affected states, leveraging resources of, and partnerships with, multilateral institutions, non-governmental  organizations, implementing partners, and like-minded nations. In 2018, PSOPs became a permanent program of the Government of Canada, representing a significant step forward in how the Government of Canada is equipped and structured to prevent conflict, respond to peace and stability challenges, and support transformative changes in how political, economic and social power are negotiated, shared, and used by different actors in fragile and conflict-affected states.

PSOPs has two core responsibilities:

The program provides visible and concrete assistance in response to conflicts and crises abroad through targeted programming, the deployment of civilian personnel and Canadian police officers (in partnership with Public Safety Canada and the RCMP), and direct support to the UN and multilateral peace operations, conflict prevention, mediation, and peacebuilding efforts.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: PSOPs did not require an audit during the 2018–19 fiscal year.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: No evaluation was completed during the 2018–19 fiscal year. In accordance with the rolling five-year evaluation plan, an evaluation of PSOPs will be conducted in 2020–2021.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: In 2018-19, PSOPs received 79 initial project applications and approved 43 new initiatives.

PSOPs project officers conducted 26 scoping and monitoring missions in Africa (Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali, Senegal, and South Sudan), the Americas (Colombia and Haiti), Asia (Myanmar, Philippines, Sri Lanka), Eastern Europe (Ukraine), and the Middle East (Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, West Bank/Gaza). The objective of these missions was to meet with relevant domestic and international organizations and government officials to discuss potential projects, monitor ongoing project performance, and discuss drivers of instability.

Missions included consultations with multilateral organizations, government officials and civil society actors. A total of 24 out of 26 (92 %) missions included meetings with women’s groups and, where possible, women’s ministries, as well as local offices of the UN dedicated to women’s rights.

Two scoping and monitoring missions, to Mali and Ukraine, were conducted specifically in support of the Canadian Police Arrangement and included meetings with relevant domestic and international organizations and government officials, including women’s groups. In addition to these missions, travel to UN Headquarters in New York was undertaken, which involved meetings with UN Women and the UN Police Division, as well as travel to Rome for the Meeting of the Police Training Sub-Group for Iraq, which involved meetings with Global Coalition members, the EU, the UN Development Program and other key stakeholders from Iraq.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total grants133,985,518142,733,211133,000,00096,343,13396,343,133-36,656,867
Total contributions40,638,721110,127,78745,500,00065,284,98665,284,98619,784,986
Total program174,624,239252,860,998178,500,000161,628,119161,628,119-16,871,881
Explanation of variancesPSOPs successfully programmed and disbursed its transfer payment funding allotment. The spending below the planned amount for grants and above the planned amount for contributions is due to reallocation between these two lines during the fiscal year to better respond to the needs on the ground. The variance in the total spending is largely due to the fact that the additional funds for Afghanistan programming were not transferred to PSOPs as originally envisaged and were expended by the department’s Asia Pacific Branch. 

Projects and Development Activities Resulting from La Francophonie Summits

Name of transfer payment program: Projects and development activities resulting from La Francophonie summits

Start date: March 9, 1979

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 29. Multilateral International Assistance

Description: This program provides funding to cooperation programs and activities undertaken by the International Organisation of La Francophonie (IOF). It also provides financial support to the Government of New Brunswick to foster its participation in summits, ministerial conferences and other related La Francophonie activities. This program promotes Canadian interests and is consistent with Canada’s political and economic objectives for La Francophonie. Recipients may be required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved : Canada remains strongly committed to the International Organisation of La Francophonie (IOF), an important forum it uses to mobilize the international community around priority issues. Canada has actively contributed to the development of the IOF’s four-year 2019–2022 programming, which was adopted at the Yerevan Summit in October 2018, and encouraged the IOF to consider gender equality (GE) in the implementation of its 18 programs. Canada has also played an active role in the development and adoption of the La Francophonie Strategy for the Promotion of Gender Equality and the Rights and Empowerment of Women and Girls at the Yerevan Summit. Canada cooperated with all of its partners to make this theme a cross-cutting priority underpinning all the actions of La Francophonie’s institutions

Canada has also played a leading role in the development and adoption of IOF’s first transparency consolidation policy at the Yerevan Summit in 2018. Canada thus advocated for more rigorous governance and transparency measures to further consolidate the organization’s administrative and financial governance practices. In March 2019, Canada’s leadership was recognized by IOF’s Secretary General and members when it appointed a Canadian, Catherine Cano, as its first female administrator.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: None

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: None

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: Every year, the Administrator of the OIF presents a review of the organization and its programming activities to its members. Programming achievements for 2018–19 will be presented in fall 2019 as part of the OIF’s 2018 Progress Report on programming.

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions7,829,9498,202,5008,000,0008,297,0008,297,000297,000
Total program7,829,9498,202,5008,000,0008,297,0008,297,000297,000
Explanation of variancesSince fiscal year 2012–13, this program has provided $7.5 million in voluntary funding to the OIF and its institutions and $0.8 million in financial support to the Government of New Brunswick, for a total of $8.3 million. Since the funding for this program is fixed at $8 million, it receives $0.3 million annually in supplementary funding from other Global Affairs Canada funds.  In 2018–19, this supplementary funding of $0.3 million was not fully required since the OIF and its institutions did not receive the entire amount of their funding ($7,497,000 of Canada’s planned $7.5 million voluntary contribution). The voluntary contribution that the OIF and its institutions receive is based on the implementation rate of their programming over the fiscal year. Due to these circumstances, the actual spending for 2018–19 amounted to $8,297,000 instead of $8.3 million.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Name of transfer payment program: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

Start date: UNESCO was founded in 1945, and Canada has been a member since inception.

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to UNESCO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy goals related to culture, science and education and provide it with a voice in the international community. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

UNESCO’s program and budget, which set out the strategic objectives and expected outcomes for the organization’s work, are approved every two years by the UNESCO General Conference. For further information, visit the UNESCO website.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: UNESCO has an external auditor and provides regular audited financial statements. For more information, consult UNESCO’s audit and evaluation reports.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions11,591,06112,272,27412,217,31811,733,29911,733,299-484,019
Total program11,591,06112,272,27412,217,31811,733,29911,733,299-484,019
Explanation of variancesAssessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Member States, including Canada, are legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. Currency fluctuations are also a factor.

United Nations Organization

Name of transfer payment program: United Nations Organization (UN)

Start date: The UN was established in 1945, and Canada has been a member since inception.

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s assessed contribution to the regular budget of the United Nations is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy goals related to international peace, security and development and provide it with a voice in the international community. Assessed contributions are used to finance the organization’s programs toward attainment of the UN’s objectives, as set out in its Charter. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

The UN’s program and budget, which set out the strategic objectives and expected outcomes for the organization’s work, are approved every two years by the UN General Assembly. For further information, please visit the website of the UN.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The United Nations Board of Auditors (UNBOA) was established in 1946. For more than 70 years the heads of the supreme audit institutions from the UN Member States have provided independent, professional and quality audit services. The current UNBOA members are Germany, India and Chile. For more information, please see the UN Board of Auditors’ Report A/73/5 (Vol. II)

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions100,964,60591,383,841103,266,134106,987,840104,435,8411,169,707
Total program100,964,60591,383,841103,266,134106,987,840104,435,8411,169,707
Explanation of variancesAssessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Member States, including Canada, are legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. Currency fluctuations are also a factor.

United Nations Peacekeeping Operations

Name of transfer payment program: UN Peacekeeping Operations

Start date: The UN was established in 1945, and Canada has been a member since inception.

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: United Nations peacekeeping operations help countries torn by conflict to create the conditions for lasting peace. In addition to maintaining peace and security, peacekeepers are increasingly charged with assisting in political processes, reforming judicial systems, training law enforcement and police forces, disarming and reintegrating former combatants, and supporting the return of internally displaced persons and refugees. Canada’s assessed contribution to UN peacekeeping operations is a legally binding obligation of membership. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The audit examination conducted by the UN Board of Auditors included UN Headquarters, 14 active field missions, 32 completed missions and the six 6 special-purpose accounts, namely the Peacekeeping Reserve Fund; the support account for peacekeeping operations; the United Nations Logistics Base at Brindisi, Italy, including the Global Service Centre; the peacekeeping cost recovery fund; and the employee benefits funds. For more information, please see the UN Board of Auditors’ Report A/73/5 (Vol. II)

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions259,066,333248,147,108269,928,306276,230,008244,720,832-25,207,474
Total program259,066,333248,147,108269,928,306276,230,008244,720,832-25,207,474
Explanation of variancesThe assessed budgets for UN peacekeeping operations are negotiated outcomes of the UN’s Fifth Committee, and Member States, including Canada, are legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. The creation of new missions and unexpected crisis situations can significantly alter the budgets. Currency fluctuations are also a factor.

World Health Organization

Name of transfer payment program: World Health Organization (WHO)

Start date: The WHO was founded in 1948, and Canada has been a member since inception.

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2011-2012

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 3. Multilateral Policy

Description: Canada’s annual assessed contribution to the WHO is a legally binding obligation of membership. The purpose of membership is to further the Government of Canada’s foreign policy goals related to health and provide it with a voice in the international community. For further information, please visit the WHO website. Recipients are not required to repay funds obtained under this transfer payment program.

Results achieved :

The WHO’s General Programme of Work sets out the organization’s high level plan of work for a four year period. In 2018, the 71st World Health Assembly approved the WHO’s 13th General Programme of Work (GPW13) for the years 2019 to 2023. In addition, the WHO has biennial programme budgets that set out the strategic objectives and expected outcomes for the organization’s work, and are approved every two years by the World Health Assembly. For additional details on results and plans, please consult: the WHO programme budget.

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: WHO has an External Auditor and provides regular audited financial reports.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: N/A

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions17,917,99717,930,31417,725,39918,709,17618,709,176983,777
Total program17,917,99717,930,31417,725,39918,709,17618,709,176983,777
Explanation of variancesAssessed budgets of international organizations are negotiated outcomes, and Member States, including Canada, are legally bound by the final outcome of these negotiations. Currency fluctuations are also a factor.

World Trade Organization 

Name of transfer payment program: World Trade Organization (WTO)

Start date: January 1, 1995

End date: Ongoing

Type of transfer payment: Contribution

Type of appropriation: Estimates

Fiscal year for terms and conditions: 2009-2010

Link to the department’s Program Inventory: Program 18. Trade Policy, Agreements Negotiations, Agreements and Disputes

Description: The World Trade Organization (WTO) is a cornerstone of Canada’s trade policy, providing a common set of rules, rights and obligations for the trade policies of its 164 members and a forum for Canada to advance its trade interests on the broadest possible basis. The WTO provides Canada with the opportunity to build alliances, influence rules and secure concessions on issues where it may otherwise have less leverage. Issues such as agriculture subsidies and regulatory concerns (e.g. sanitary and phytosanitary measures) are more effectively addressed multilaterally. The WTO also has a robust dispute settlement system, of which Canada is a regular end user. Through the ongoing work of its many committees, the WTO provides a forum for Canada to raise and resolve a range of trade irritants and market access issues. Finally, the WTO is also an active forum for trade policy monitoring and surveillance.

WTO negotiations have been effectively stalled since 2008, with WTO members disagreeing on whether the mandates of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) remain a relevant and viable basis from which to advance multilateral negotiations. Canada and other like-minded countries believe that the DDA mandates are no longer viable and that the WTO must explore new ways to conclude work on the outstanding Doha-round issues while also exploring issues not explicitly mentioned in the Doha mandates. There is now increasing consensus amongst WTO members that the organization needs to be strengthened and modernized. As an active member of the organization and in keeping with Canada’s traditional multilateral trade leadership, Canada has convened a small group of likeminded countries (the “Ottawa Group”) with the objective of helping drive discussions towards realistic and pragmatic ideas to safeguard and update the WTO.

Results achieved :

Findings of audits completed in 2018–19: The WTO is subject to an audit by external auditors every calendar year. As a member of the WTO, Canada has access to all audits, evaluations and performance reviews completed by or on behalf of the WTO. In its performance audit report released on June 7, 2019, the external auditor certified that the WTO’s financial statements fairly present the financial situation of the WTO as of December 31, 2018, and placed an unqualified opinion on these statements.

Findings of evaluations completed in 2018–19: The WTO’s external auditors conduct a performance audit of the WTO, which is based on standards set by the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. The 2018 performance audit was released on June 7, 2019.

Engagement of applicants and recipients in 2018–19: N/A

Financial information (dollars)
Type of transfer payment2016–17 Actual
spending
2017–18 Actual
spending
2018–19 Planned
spending
2018–19 Total
authorities available for use
2018–19 Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance (2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
Total contributions6,547,3326,417,5077,032,2176,667,6036,667,603-364,614
Total program6,547,3326,417,5077,032,2176,667,6036,667,603-364,614
Explanation of variancesCanada’s contribution to the WTO budget is based on its share of world trade and is calculated and paid in Swiss francs. Planned spending was based on the best information available at the time. The actual spending represents the precise amount of the contribution that was calculated in late 2017 and converted into Canadian dollars at the time payment was made. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the period when the estimate is prepared and the period when payment is disbursed account for the variance.

Gender-based analysis plus

Governance structures

Global Affairs Canada has a complex and diverse mandate as it manages Canada’s diplomatic and consular relations, promotes the country’s international trade and leads Canada’s international development and humanitarian assistance. In support of this mandate, Global Affairs Canada uses a Government of Canada analytical tool called Gender-Based Analysis Plus (or simply GBA+). GBA+ is an analytical tool that helps assess how diverse groups of women, men and gender-diverse people may experience policies, programs and initiatives. The “plus” in GBA+ acknowledges that GBA goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences. We all have multiple identity factors that intersect to make us who we are; GBA+ also considers many other identity factors, like race, ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability.

In this context, Global Affairs Canada continues to explore opportunities to enhance its leadership, capacity, training and necessary tools for the implementation of GBA+ throughout the Department. The Department has taken a decentralized approach to the practice of GBA+ for its over 10,000 employees. In lieu of a central responsibility center, the Department continues to explore a more horizontal approach to the application of GBA+ assessments of submissions to Cabinet, Central Agencies and ministers. As the subject matter experts, the proposal leads are ultimately responsible for the conclusions of their GBA+ assessments. Although the review process is essentially one of self-assessment, there are well established and dedicated resource center of GBA+ expertise within the Department, for example, within the Global Issues and Development Branch. Global Affairs Canada is also increasing GBA+ competencies of subject matter experts in other branches working in such diverse areas as peace and security, and investment and trade.

Since 2016, and consistent with direction from the Privy Council Office and Treasury Board Secretariat, the Department has required mandatory GBA+ assessments for all Memoranda to Cabinet, Treasury Board submissions and Budget Proposals. More recently, GBA+ has also been applied to regulatory instruments. Before these proposals can be considered complete, proposal leads submit their GBA+ assessments to the Corporate Secretariat for a final review to confirm that the mandatory requirements of the central agencies have been met. The offices of the ministers will not accept proposals without this final check.

Some of the approaches the Department uses to increase the profile of GBA+ include the following:

Human resources

The Department has more than 17 full time equivalent(s) (FTE) supporting gender analysis. There are currently 12 FTEs working on development assistance policies and programming, including implementation of the Department’s Gender Equality Policy. Recognizing the significance of the application of GBA+ to trade agreements, there are now a total of about 4 FTEs working on this issue when portions of FTEs working on trade policy and negotiations are taken into consideration. An additional 6 to 10 individuals play various associated support roles so that a portion of their FTEs will support GBA+ implementation such as gender focal points, GBA champions, educators and managers across the Department, including in areas such as peace and security, trade and investment, and GBA+ process oversight of submissions to Cabinet and ministers.

Both GBA+ specialists and subject matter experts from across the Department contribute to GBA+ through participation on internal and external committees as well as in governance bodies:

Major initiatives: results achieved

Applying GBA+ to all G7 work under Canada’s 2018 Presidency

These actions led to concrete results. During the 2018 G7 Presidency, Canadian leadership leveraged $3.8B from G7 partners to support quality education for women and girls in crisis, conflict-affected, and fragile states, of which Canada contributed $400 million. A few months later, during the United Nations General Assembly, Canada welcomed an additional $527 million from partners to help developing countries give every child access to quality education and modern skills training. These unprecedented commitments recognize that education is the key to advancing gender equality and achieving a more equal, inclusive world. The G7 Leaders Summit concluded with the Charlevoix Communique and all seven commitments which included gender-specific outcomes, and three (Charlevoix Declaration on Quality Education for Girls, Adolescent Girls and Women in Developing Countries; Charlevoix Commitment to End Sexual and Gender-Based Violence, Abuse and Harassment in Digital Contexts; and Charlevoix Commitment on Equality and Economic Growth) were specifically targeted initiatives addressing gender issues. In the 2018 GEAC Report, more G7 outcome documents and reports were noted as having integrated or explicitly addressed gender equality than ever before: 81% compared to an average of 46% over the five previous years.

Strengthening GBA+ capacity at Global Affairs Canada and abroad

Central America

GBA+ training sessions took place in Guatemala and Nicaragua with the objective to increase mission’s staff and partners’ capacity in integrating GBA+ into policy development and programming.

The Canadian Embassy in Chile hosted a combined GBA+ training for Chilean partners and mission staff on January 8-10, 2019.

Caribbean Region

52 partners and staff of the Caribbean Regional Program benefitted from GBA+ training in Kingston, Jamaica on March 12-13, 2019.

In 2018-19, Global Affairs Canada further promoted GBA+ training at mission including by:

Integration of GBA+ into free trade negotiations

Global Affairs Canada (GAC) developed a new framework to advance the application of GBA+ to trade negotiations. With the support of other government departments and for the first time, GAC is conducting a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative chapter-by-chapter GBA+ on the Canada-Mercosur FTA negotiations and aiming to regularly update the analysis over the duration of the negotiations.

GAC is also providing customized GBA+ training for trade policy analysists and lead negotiators.

The net impact of our work to date is:

GBA+ is serving as a valuable policy innovation tool to help the Department implement Canada's inclusive approach to trade, which seeks to ensure that the benefits and opportunities flowing from trade are widely shared, including amongst traditionally under-represented groups and organizations in commerce such as women, Indigenous peoples, and SMEs. The division responsible for inclusive trade (including GBA+) received the 2018-2019 DM Award for Innovation – showcasing trade policy’s strong commitment to advancing gender equality and the empowerment of women and desire to achieve concrete results.

One of Blueprint 2020’s success stories for 2018-2019 was the branch’s leadership on GBA+ of trade policy. The article highlights initiatives such as launching an evergreen GBA+ process for the ongoing Canada-Mercosur Free Trade Negotiations. It is widely recognized that conducting GBA+ on the ongoing FTA negotiations with Mercosur has been a valuable undertaking for GAC and its partner departments in the federal government. The application of GBA+ to the Mercosur FTA negotiations has served its intent and realized important benefits: It has helped officials identify the effects and opportunities of FTA provisions on the Canadian population groups; it has helped officials develop new and innovative gender responsive and inclusive trade policy provisions to address effects and opportunities; and, it has effectively informed the FTA negotiation strategy and built up the GBA+ knowledge and skills of officials. The GBA+ has also served to highlight some data and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed going forward in order to do an even better job of conducting GBA+ on FTA chapters (e.g., indirect employment effects by industry, gender and other intersectional characteristics; consumer effects). The overall benefit of applying GBA+ to the FTA negotiations is that it has the potential to help us craft and deliver a more gender responsive and inclusive trade agreement than ever before—pending the results achieved in a negotiated outcome with our trading partner Mercosur.

Canada is also working closely with its partners to deliver on its commitment to create real results that help advance gender equality and the empowerment of women. For example, Canada and Chile implemented cooperation activities under the Trade and Gender Chapter aimed at exchanging information on government programs, exchanging data and research on women entrepreneurs and their challenges, increasing understanding of the impact of trade on women’s participation in the economy and gender equality. Canada and Chile held their first Trade and Gender Committee meeting under the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement (CCFTA) Trade and Gender Chapter on April 26, 2019, to review its progress and achievements to date. These include:

A comprehensive CETA work plan on trade and gender is also being implemented, with activities seeking to better understand the gender-related effects of trade and share information on ways to reduce barriers to the participation of women in international trade. The first meeting on the CETA Joint Committee Trade and Gender recommendation took place via videoconference in Ottawa and Brussels on February 20, 2019. The second meeting took place on June 14, 2019 and delivered on item 3 of the Canada-EU Trade and Gender Implementation Plan— “Exchange of information on policies and programs that support women entrepreneurs from both a domestic and international point of view”.

Reporting capacity and data

  1. Program: Consular Assistance and Services to Canadians Abroad
    • Captures personal identifiers (Name, address, date of birth, gender/sex).  Data fields not always completed.  
      • Trend analysis by sex/gender and age.
      • No reporting undertaken.
  2. Program: International Law
    • Appointments to WTO panels for disputes where Canada is a primary litigant (January 2014-present):
      • 20% women
      • Unable to assess percentage of visible minorities.
  3. Program: International Law
    • Appointments to investment dispute settlement tribunals for disputes where Canada is a primary litigant (January 2014-present):
      • 12% women
      • Unable to assess percentage of visible minorities.
  4. Program: International Law
    • Appointments to NAFTA Chapter 19 dispute settlement tribunals for disputes where Canada is a primary litigant (January 2014-present)
      • 33% women
      • Unable to assess percentage of visible minorities.
  5. Program: International Law
    • Appointments to NAFTA Chapter 19 dispute settlement tribunals for disputes where Canada is a primary litigant (January 2014-present)
      • 36% women
      • Unable to assess percentage of visible minorities.

International Law have not been able to include numbers on visible minorities as panelists do not routinely self-declare so any existing data would be skewed and not accurate.

Horizontal Initiatives

Name of horizontal initiative: Canada’s 2018 G7 Presidency

Lead department: Global Affairs Canada

Federal partner departments: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (PSEP), Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), Shared Services Canada (SSC), Health Canada (HC), Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), Finance Canada (FIN), Department of National Defence (DND) and Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), Transport Canada (TC), Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA), and Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED).

Non‑federal and non‑governmental partners: Not applicable

Start date of the horizontal initiative: April 1, 2017

End date of the horizontal initiative: March 31, 2019

Description of the horizontal initiative: Canada held the rotating Presidency of the G7 from January 1 until December 31, 2018. On June 8-9, 2018, in La Malbaie, in the Charlevoix region of Quebec, Canada hosted the G7 Leaders’ Summit to build consensus on today’s most challenging global issues. Global Affairs Canada led in organizing the G7 Leaders’ Summit, ministerial meetings, and associated meetings and events in collaboration with multiple departments and agencies, including the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as the lead for security operations.

Governance structures: Canada’s G7 Presidency governance structure is led by the Deputy Minister for the G7 Summit and Personal Representative of the Prime Minister with the overall responsibility and accountability for the management of the 2018 G7 Presidency. He is supported by various interdepartmental committees on the planning and coordination of all G7 Presidency related activities – Leaders’ Summit, Ministerial meetings, and associated meetings and events. These include:

Government-wide working groups supported efforts to achieve efficiencies in specific operational areas such as: Accommodations, Safety and Security, Technology, Communications Network, Justice, and Procurement.

Total federal funding allocated (from start to end date) (dollars): $577,386,532

Total federal planned spending to date (dollars): $577,386,532

Total federal actual spending to date (dollars): $425,971,866

Date of last renewal of the horizontal initiative: Not applicable

Total federal funding allocated at the last renewal, and source of funding (dollars): Not applicable

Additional federal funding received after the last renewal (dollars): Not applicable

Funding contributed by non‑federal and non‑governmental partners: Not applicable

Fiscal year of planned completion of next evaluation : Each department was responsible for their internal evaluation of the 2018 Canadian G7 Presidency. These evaluations were taken into consideration in the cross-departmental review of the 1996 Framework for the Management and Funding of Prime Minister-led Summits of an International Nature. 

Shared outcome of federal partners: The shared outcomes of this horizontal initiative are as follows:

Policy and Summitry:

Safe and Secure Summit:

Performance indicators: Policy and Summitry:

Safe and Secure Summit:

Targets:

Policy and Summitry:

Safe and Secure Summit:

  1. No critical issues.
  2. 100% of security measures:
    • Ensure protocols are established to deal with any possible major incident.
    • Ensure readiness to implement established protocols in the event of an emergency.

Data source and frequency of monitoring and reporting: As there were multiple federal partners involved in the G7 Presidency and numerous events taking place over a two-year timeframe, the related monitoring and reporting activities were ongoing throughout fiscal years 2017-18 and 2018-19. Each department was responsible for monitoring and reporting its results as per their internal requirements. In addition to any internal reporting requirements, Global Affairs Canada’s Summits Management Office also required all other government departments to provide monthly financial reports on their 2018 G7 Presidency spending throughout both fiscal years in which funds were received. Results were then analyzed in a broader perspective by Global Affairs Canada to determine the attainment of indicators for the shared outcomes.

Results: The 2018 G7 Canadian Presidency – Leaders’ Summit, Ministerial meetings, and all other related events – was delivered successfully without any major incidents. Proper measures and protocols were implemented ahead of time to ensure safe and secure events, as well as preparedness to respond to any eventuality throughout the Canadian Presidency.

Participants – heads of state/government, federal partners, G7 counterparts, and other stakeholders – were, in general, satisfied with the policy development efforts and the outcome of the 2018 Canadian G7 Presidency. Through the various meetings held ahead of the Leaders’ Summit, participants had the opportunity to debate and develop agreements and policies that culminated in the approval of The Charlevoix G7 Summit Communique. 

Expected outcome or result of non‑federal and non‑governmental partners: Not applicable

Name of theme: Not applicable

Performance highlights: The 2018 Canadian G7 Presidency was successfully delivered without any critical incidents hindering the safety of events. Throughout the year of the Presidency, numerous forums were created in which in-depth discussions revolving around the themes of the Presidency could be undertaken. These discussions resulted in seven commitment documents as well as The Charlevoix G7 Summit Communiqué, also known as the G7 leaders’ communiqué, which reasserted the participants’ dedication to taking on some of the most pressing global challenges. Canada, as the host of the 2018 edition of the G7 Presidency, was able to set the agenda for the year, use this opportunity to showcase its leadership and position itself as a front-runner in combatting climate change and gender inequality on the international stage.

Contact information:

Benoit Bouvier, Director – Corporate Services
Summits Management Office
Global Affairs Canada
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G2

2018-19 Global Affairs Canada Horizontal Initiative Planning Information Table

Shared Outcome(s): All participants (Canadians and foreigners) are satisfied with the organization of the Summit and other associated G7 meetings and events and with the policy development efforts which aim to advance global security and prosperity and promote Canadian interests and values.

Performance Indicator(s): % of participants - Prime Minister, federal partners, participants and other stakeholders - that are satisfied with Canada’s G7 Summitry and other meetings and events

Target(s): No major incidents in which summitry preparations failed, or negatively affected the conduct of the G7 Summit

Result(s): 0 major incidents

Performance Indicator(s): % of participants - Prime Minister, federal partners, G7 counterparts and other stakeholders – that are satisfied with the Canadian G7 Presidency policy development efforts

Target(s): 80-100 % satisfaction of the G7 membership, G7 participants, federal partners, stakeholders and Canadians with policy development efforts

Result(s): 95% satisfaction

Shared Outcome(s): The general public, Heads of State and Government and all other participants are kept safe and secure during the G7 Summit.

Performance Indicator(s): Number of critical issues encountered in the implementation of the security measures required by the Security Plan

Target(s): No critical issues (0)

Result(s): 0 critical issues

Performance Indicator(s): % of security measures implemented to react to incidents that are successful in negating and/or mitigating these incidents over the course of the G7 Summit

Target(s): 100% of security measures

Result(s): 100% of security measures implemented

Performance Information

Financial information included in the tables below do not include previously existing departmental funds. Only new funds granted through Canada’s 2018 G7 Presidency Treasury Board Submission are included.

Federal departmentLink to the department’s Program InventoryHorizontal initiative activitiesTotal federal allocation (from start to end date) (dollars)2018–19 Planned spending (dollars)2018–19 Actual spending (dollars)2018–19 Expected results2018–19 Performance indicators2018–19 TargetsDate to achieve target2018–19 Actual results
Credits from sale of G7 vehicles of $18 million were applied against the 2018-19 Demobilization expenditures.
Global Affairs Canada (GAC)1.2 Diplomacy, Advocacy & International AgreementsGlobal Affairs Canada Activity 1: Support the Prime Minister in developing Canada’s G7 policy framework and holding the 2018 G7 Presidency5,258,3452,765,7241,424,555International actors are engaged and influenced to gain support for actions consistent with Canada’s interests and values.Degree to which Canadian positions are reflected in G7 Summit documents.80%March 31, 201980%
1.2.2 Summitry and Multilateral Diplomacy and AdvocacyGlobal Affairs Canada Activity 2: Planning, coordinating and implementing G7 logistics and operations94,611,28562,498,21354,331,393Effective coordination and efficient delivery of Canadian G7 operations and logistical efforts.Degree to which foreign representatives and decision makers were reached through meetings, consultations, negotiations, events and visits via the delivery of the Leaders’ Summit, ministerial meetings and other associated events.80%March 31, 201980%
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (PSEP)1.1.1 National Security Leadership - Portfolio Affairs and Communications Branch (PACB)PSEP Activity 3: Support to a potential ministerial meeting (related to anti-terrorism or security)26,923166,142153,444Effective and efficient coordination of the discussion held by the ministers of interior / public safety and of the final public documents.% of partners and stakeholders that are satisfied with the coordination provided by PACB.100%April 23-24, 2018A formal survey was not conducted, and proved impractical due to the plethora of different sets of international and domestic partners collaborating on different aspects of the event. Nevertheless, G7 partner countries expressed strong appreciation of Canada’s coordination and consultation in developing and disseminating the agenda and outcomes. Public Safety Canada had a productive collaboration with Global Affairs Canada at senior levels. Public Safety portfolio agencies were also engaged as stakeholders, including at the level of deputy head.
Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC)1.1 AcquisitionsPSPC Activity 1: Acquisitions709,891191,967156,777Open acquisitions that provide the best value to Canadians and are delivered effectively and efficiently to the satisfaction of the government.Highly complex procurement contracts processed within 100 working days from original request for proposal (RFP) solicitation date.80%July 31, 2018100%
1.2 Accommodation Management and Real Property ServicesPSPC Activity 2: Accommodation Management and Real Property Services30,776,31715,401,94012,784,414Federal organizations receive responsive and cost-effective real property services.% of all real property projects over $1 million that are on time, on budget and on scope (average of on‑time, on‑budget and on‑scope performance indicators).95%March 31, 2019100%
1.6 Linguistic Management and ServicesPSPC Activity 3: Linguistic Management and Services2,515,1201,727,4691,759,681The Government of Canada benefits from efficient, quality and timely multilingual linguistic services to support Canada’s year‑long presidency of G7 operations and communications.% of clients submitting requests for linguistic services respecting the defined service standard who are satisfied with services provided by the Translation Bureau.85%October 31, 2018100%
Finance Canada (FC)

1.1 Economic and Fiscal Policy Framework

1.1.6 Sub-Program: International Trade and Finance

The sub-program provides analysis, research and advice to the Minister of Finance and government officials so that they can make informed decisions on the Government of Canada’s international trade and financial policy agenda.

The sub-program also manages the Department of Finance Canada’s participation in international economic coordination groups such as the G7.

3,989,9001,983,9261,869,620Ministers and senior government officials have access to evidence-based analysis, research and advice on matters that impact the Government of Canada’s international trade and finance policy agenda.% of agreed-upon deadlines for briefing material that were met.90%March 31, 2019

100% of agreed-upon deadlines for briefing materials to support the Minister’s and the department’s participation at G7 meetings in 2018–19 were met.

A review of Finance Canada’s Management of the 2018 G7 Finance Ministers, Central Bank Governors was completed by Finance Canada Internal Audit Directorate. The result of the review was favourable and positive and it was determined that in light of the exceptional results of the planning phase, the Internal Audit Directorate concluded that there is no need to proceed with any further engagement of external audit.

No significant lapses or concerns were identified with respect to:

  • Budgetary estimates and planning;
  • Policy development;
  • Logistics; and
  • Financial monitoring and reporting.
Shared Services Canada (SSC)1.3 TelecommunicationsThe sub-program - 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 1.3.3.3 and 1.3.5 provide telecommunication services, both voice and data, to the Government of Canada so that it may deliver on its programs and priorities.41,415,08317,700,00026,069,382Participants in Summit-supporting departments have robust and reliable access to voice and data services to deliver the mandate.Uptime in communications during the event.100%March 31, 2019All tele-communications experiences no outages or downtime, achieving SSC’s goal of 100% availability (uptime).
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness1.3.2.2 RCMP and PolicingPSEP Activity 1: Implementation of the Framework –Internal Cost Estimates1,581,318787,338502,559Ensure common understanding and cooperation between the Province of Quebec and other jurisdictions and the federal government through early and ongoing engagement.Variance between the audit-recommended reimbursement amount and the jurisdiction’s final claim submitted.Maximum of 10%March 31, 2019

Government of Quebec 2018-19 – Result will be available once the final decision on the claim has been made.

Toronto Police Services Board – 3%

Resort Municipality of Whistler – 0%

Halifax Regional Police – 1%

Efficient management of the Framework.Ratio of Framework administrative support costs versus the reimbursement to local jurisdiction costs.Maximum of 3%March 31, 2019Results will be available once all reimbursements have been finalized.
1.3.2.2 RCMP and PolicingPSEP Activity 1: Implementation of the Framework – Grants and Contributions (reimbursement)94,608,010

69,789,392

** amount does not include PSPC or SSC amounts

61,238,735

* subject to audit

** amount does not include PSPC or SSC amounts

Timely provision of financial assistance to Province of Quebec and other jurisdictions.Final payment issued as per the Contribution Agreement.30 days following approval of the Audit Report by the Minister (or authorized delegate) of PSEP.March 31, 2019

Government of Quebec – Result will be available once the final payment has been made.

Toronto Police Services Board – 27 Days

Resort Municipality of Whistler – 27 Days

Halifax Regional Police – 14 Days

Cooperation of jurisdictions in the provision of policing and security.% of jurisdictions that cooperate with the RCMP in the provision of policing and security. by all jurisdictions100% of jurisdictions cooperatedMarch 31, 2019100%
1.4.2 Emergency PreparednessPSEP Activity 2: Safety and security planning and the security planning exercise program2,123,371802,751544,551Operational readiness is achieved through the effective engagement and coordination of federal partners in the development and implementation of the whole-of-government Safety and Security Plan, as well as their active participation in the security exercise program.a) % of federal partners engaged in the development of the plan.a) 90%May 2018100%
b) % of objectives evaluated in the security exercise program, Sentinelle I and Sentinelle II.b) 90%May 2018100%
Royal Canadian Mounted Police1.1.2.4 Protective ServicesRCMP Activity 1: Event Planning22,482,7176,918,82427,594,453Effective coordination and collaboration with clients and security partners related to G7.Number of occurrences where the RCMP failed to engage partners and/or share information/intelligence following the incident.0 occurrencesJune 20180 occurrences
RCMP Activity 2: Event Operations (Mobilization)233,238,272122,430,765112,070,505Effective event security operations are provided for the G7.Percentage of reported incidents for which a breach in protocol occurred.0%June 20180%
RCMP Activity 3: Demobilization3,252,8773,252,877(14,343,569)1Safe and secure event.Number of incidents that have disrupted the proper functioning of the event.0 incidentsJune 20180 incidents
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)**CSIS will report internally on their expected results through the appropriate mechanism in place.
Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)1.3 Admissibility DeterminationMajor Event Management and Horizontal Planning411,636192,159112,356G7 team participates in all planning and information-sharing activities.% of planning and information-sharing commitments by the CBSA G7 team fulfilled.100%March 31, 2018100% integration and engagement of all stakeholders
1.1.3 Risk Assessment, Security Screening, Intelligence Collection and AnalysisIntelligence Integration and Accreditation171,408171,40895,576High-risk people, goods and conveyances that pose a threat to the security of the G7 event and Canadians are identified, examined and intercepted at the earliest point.a) % of accreditation applications completed.a) 100%Fiscal year 2018–19100% of accreditation applications completed
b) % of incremental volumes of National Security Screening cases completed.b) 100%March 31, 2019100% of incremental volumes of National Security Screening cases completed
1.1 Admissibility DeterminationTemporary Site-Specific Logistics and Event Operational Delivery500,713500,713310,501Admissible G7 travellers (dignitaries / guests / support teams) are facilitated and processed according to established legislation at remote satellite operational sites.% of G7 travellers whose travel is facilitated and who gain entry into Canada.100%March 31, 2019100% of admissible G7  travellers’(dignitaries / guests / support teams) entrances facilitated and processed according to established legislation at remote satellite operational sites
Department of National Defence (DND) / Canadian Armed Forces (CAF)3.0 Defence ready for element productionDND Activity 1: Support to the Safety and Security Operational Planning and the Security Exercise Program9,689,0006,590,6660G7 Leaders’ Summit security is enabled through specialized training of CAF members in accordance with operational plans and exercises developed in preparation for the G7 Summit; Defence Force Elements are at the required level of readiness and prepared to fulfill their assigned Force Posture and Readiness (FP&R) roles.% of allocated forces declared operationally ready prior to the G7 Summit.100%June 1, 2018The CAF met the target of having 100% of its personnel and units trained by 01 Jun 2018.
2.2.1 Counter terrorism, terrorism event response and consequence management operationsDND Activity 2: Support to anti- and counter-terrorism measures for security of the G7 Summit000The G7 Summit is not disrupted by any terrorist incidents.Number of terrorist incidents that have disrupted the proper functioning of the event.0 eventsJune 1, 2018Canadian Special Operations Forces maintain this capability within baseline funding. The G7 summit was not disrupted by any terrorist incidents.
2.2.2 Assistance to major Canadian event operationsDND Activity 3: Conducting a major domestic operation as assistance to a major Canadian special security event25,625,00025,625,00014,374,372DND/CAF capabilities, operations and services facilitate safety and security at the 2018 G7 Summit.% of requested DND/CAF capabilities to support the security mission for the 2018 G7 Summit that are delivered.100%June 1, 2018CAF personnel and units were deployed as planned and were operationally ready by the target dates. DND/CAF capabilities, operations and services successfully facilitated safety and security at the 2018 G7 Summit.
Health Canada (HC)Program 1.2 Specialized Health ServicesHC Activity 1: Internationally Protected Persons (IPP) Program5,424,2583,726,3452,987,194Meet both urgent and non‑urgent health care needs of the IPPs and requests from partner agencies.% of required Memoranda of Agreements (MOAs) to secure goods and services from the Government of Quebec that have been signed by May 2018.100% of required MOAs signed by May 2018.May 2018100% - all health requests for IPPs were met
% of both urgent and non-urgent health care needs of the IPPs that are met within medically accepted timeframes.100% of urgent and non-urgent health services needs of the IPPs and requests from partner agencies are met.June 20181.4% - Only 1 of 70 patients was transferred outside to provincial medical service providers
% of G7 Summit patients requiring further diagnosis or treatment from local/provincial medical service providers, with the aim of reducing the burden on the local/provincial health care systems.Less than 5% of patients require further diagnosis or treatment from local/ provincial medical service providers.June 2018100% all agreements were signed before the end of May 2018.
Program 1.2 Specialized Health ServicesHC Activity 2: Employee Assistance Services (EAS)488,200142,124127,902Ensure a Psychosocial Emergency Preparedness and Response Team (PSERT) is available at all times to provide psychosocial support to federal workers involved in the Summit in the event of an emergency.18 PSERT members are trained and ready to provide support days before the Summit.100% of the PSERT members are trained and ready by May 2018.March 2018N/A
Program 1.2 Specialized Health ServicesHC Activity 3: Public Service Occupational Health Program (PSOHP)N/AN/AN/AFederal organizations receive the advice and guidance they require to support their obligation to respond to occupational health and safety issues.PSOHP provides advice and guidance on occupational health and safety in response to requests from federal organizations within service standards.1N/APSOHP’s Senior Medical Advisor and an Occupational Hygienist were trained for the event and on standby for the duration of the G7 Summit, but received no requests.
Program 2.6 Radiation ProtectionHC Activity 4: Radiation Protection Bureau (RPB)1,713,837500,117230,764The RCMP National CBRNE Team receives the required scientific and technical assets and expertise to support radiological security surveillance and response to radiological threats during the G7 Summit.Radiological surveillance and scientific analysis and advice are provided to the RCMP National CBRNE Team as required during the Summit.100% of alarms and anomalies are assessed. All requests for scientific analysis and advice from the RCMP are provided during the Summit in June 2018.June 2018Radiological surveillance and scientific analysis and advice were provided to the RCMP national CBRNE Team during the Summit; 100% of alarms and anomalies were assessed, and all requests for scientific analysis and advice from the RCMP were addressed.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)

1.1. Food Safety Program;

1.2 Animal Health and Zoonotics Program;

1.3 Plant Resources Program

DRF: Monitoring and Enforcement for Food Safety, Plant Health, Animal Health and Consumer Protection

CFIA Activity 1: Airport/border surveillance and inspection69,37252,90152,901Support provided to Canada Border Services Agency on airport/border surveillance and inspection to prevent entry into Canada of agricultural materials (animal products and plants) or food that may pose a threat, either intentional or accidental, to dignitaries or to the Canadian public. The support of CFIA inspectors will help CBSA ensure the steady flow of the search process while carefully monitoring the risks.% of G7 travellers identified by CBSA as potentially transporting agricultural materials or food whose travel is facilitated and who gain entry into Canada.100%March 31, 2019CBSA did not identify any potential issue to CFIA staff on duty.
% of hours of operations of designated points of entry's Summit delegations admission control points where a designated CFIA inspector is present.100%March 31, 2019CBSA further identified no need for CFIA staff to be onsite. CFIA provided on-call staff for all CBSA control points’ hours of operations.

1.1. Food Safety Program

DRF: Monitoring and Enforcement for Food Safety, Plant Health, Animal Health and Consumer Protection

CFIA Activity 2: Enhanced presence at federally inspected food processing plants110,46082,23484,234All federally registered establishments supplying food to the Summit meet CFIA standards/ requirement.% of inspection results provided to Health Canada in relation to the targeted establishments.100%March 31, 2019CFIA has provided inspection reports for all (100%) of the establishment identified by Health Canada.
Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)1.3.1 Emergency Preparedness and ResponseEmergency Preparedness and Response974,076387,656308,291Operational readiness of the Health Portfolio Operations Centre.% of staff assigned and trained.100%March 31, 2019

Target met at 100%

24 x PHAC personnel received HPOC Incident Management Specific Training.

Staff participated in Exercise Sentinelle II with mentor support. On completion, staff was considered fully trained and fit for their role.

Target met with 100% of staff assigned and trained.

Quarantine Services and Travelling Public Program training to address specific G7 risks/protocols.% of personnel trained to identify G7 risks and ability to recognize ill travellers at points of entry.80 %March 31, 2019Target met with 100% of staffed trained to identify G7 risks and have the ability to recognize ill travellers at points of entry.
Augmentation of medical countermeasures (MCMs).% of availability of MCMs.80%March 31, 2019

Target met at 100%

All planned acquisition of MCMs completed. MCMs were deployed successfully to QC Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux partners and to HC Internationally Protected Persons Program.

Intelligence and surveillance.% of reports distributed and contributed to intelligence.98% (capacity of personnel)March 31, 2019

Target met at 100%:

  • 6 reports before G7 Summit
  • 9 reports during the G7 Summit
  • 1 report after the G7 Summit
National Microbiology Laboratory1,002,720670,469668,014a) Scientific and technical assets of the Microbiological Emergency Response Team provided to support the RCMP National CBRNE Team to address biological threats during the G7 Summit.a) % of samples received and assessed.a) 100%March 31, 2019Scientific assets co-deployed with RCMP National CBRNE team during summit period.Aerosol monitoring of venues provided. 333 samples received and assessed during deployment period through the mobile truck laboratory
b) Establish a mobile biologics laboratory at G7 site to support the National CBRNE Team.b) Mobile laboratory is prepositioned at the Summit venue in June 2018 in support of the National CBRNE Team.b) 100% triage of all security samples provided for biological threat analysis from RCMP.March 31, 2019a) 24/7 Biological aerosol monitoring support achieved with contractor support (Dycor)
b) Laboratory staff from other divisions cross trained to support MERT
c) 2 exercises conducted prior to the event to support cross training, preparedness activities and concept of operations for testing
d) mobile equipment QC’d prior to event – multiple pieces of equipment were procured to allow high-throughput screening. 7940 PCR tests completed over deployment period. 
Regional419,581294,456180,968Coordinated approach with provincial authorities.Provision of PHAC inventory of available resources to support PT health authorities.80% PT authorities contacted, and roles and responsibilities finalized with provincial authorities by May 2018.March 31, 2019Target met with 100% of provincial authorities consulted on the development of the Concept of Operations.
Transport Canada (TC)3.1 Aviation SafetyProvide advice and conduct oversight relating to the management of the affected airspace; establish restricted aviation zones; participate in working groups; develop and oversee implementation of Summit-specific safety measures; and communicate measures to affected industry stakeholders. Conduct oversight and enforcement activities during Summit.30,98017,0852,245No unauthorized flights and no drone activity in restricted airspace zones.Number of incursions into the restricted airspace zones; number of incidents affecting civil aviation.0 incursions and 0 incidents.June 8–9, 2018

Transport Canada’s Aviation Safety Directorate participated in the Federal Aviation Technical Working Group and established restricted airspace (three CYRs, two under s. 5.1 of the Aeronautics Act, and one Temporary Class C Military Control Zone). Two general aviation incursions occurred and were both investigated, one resulting in enforcement action.

Six drone incursions were reported, one of which temporarily grounded a helicopter. Insufficient information was obtained to permit regulatory follow-up.

Aviation Safety also provided technical expertise to Health Canada for the establishment and operation of an aeromedical evacuation capability.

4. Communications (under “Internal Services”)

Communications advice and support for TC-related issues / Communications product development

Translation services for communications products

Canada Newswire (posting of products)

Transcription services

Overtime for on-call and on-site support

Accommodations for on-site support

99,46267,4570

Successful communications activities will result in no drone activity or marine incidents in the area. Local community will be aware of impacts on their routine, such as road closures, NOTAM (Notice to Airmen).

Public documents available in both official languages.

Ability to respond to impromptu communications needs in a timely manner.

On-site communications support for Minister’s Office.

Number of news outlets reporting on the Summit in both languages; number of news stories reported in English and French media.

Number of news outlets reporting on the Transport ministerial meeting in both languages.

Number of tweets, retweets and impressions of Summit content.

*At least 10 English and French media outlets reporting on the Summit; at least five news stories (total) per day reported in English and French media during the Summit.

  • At least five English and French media outlets reporting on the Transport ministerial meeting.
  • In the months leading up to the Summit, TC will tweet and retweet a minimum of eight messages per month related to the Summit (from GAC or other partners). Through TC’s cross-promotion efforts, the target for impressions is 200,000 per month.
  • In June 2018, TC will tweet and retweet a minimum of 12 messages per month related to the Summit (from GAC or other partners). Through TC’s cross-promotion efforts, target goal for impressions is 300,000 for June 2018.
  • 60 people will retweet TC’s Summit-related tweets in June 2018.
  • TC will tweet a minimum of four messages for the Transport ministerial meeting.
June 8–9, 2018Transport Canada Communication’s Directorate reviewed products for industry stakeholders and members of the public. Tweets and social media messages were broadcast to advise of aviation and maritime restrictions in place prior to the Summit.
3.6 Aviation SecuritySite inspection, participation in working group, presence during the event, oversight during the event at multiple sites (airports).32,31220,54519,934Secure aviation operations and airports are prepared to respond rapidly to any threats and/or security incidents.Successful resolution of incidents. Aviation stakeholders are capable of implementing enhanced security measures within two hours. Aviation stakeholders are capable of implementing enhanced security measures within two hours.All site inspections completed on time; Aviation Security regulations compliance maintained at all times during the event.June 8–9, 2018Transport Canada Aviation Security worked collaboratively with Bagotville and the Quebec City airport authorities to develop contingency plans for the Summit. Table-top exercises were conducted with the airport authorities and security partners to validate the plans. Inspectors were deployed to the two airports to ensure regulatory compliance. One incident involving suspicious photography occurred, which was investigated and resolved as a non-threat.
3.1 Aviation SafetyConduct surveillance flights principally to monitor marine security exclusion zone.285,600285,50815,225Aerial surveillance support to G7 Summit Integrated Security Unit operations.Number of hours flown.
Flights conducted.
4 hours of flight time per dayJune 8–9, 20184 National Aerial Surveillance Flights were conducted on 8-9 June 2018 totalling 25.1 flight hours. 155 vessels were visually inspected. Several of these were added to the G7 Recognized Maritime Picture. No incidents.

3.2 Marine Safety and Program

3.7 Marine Security

Site inspection, security assessments, event planning, coordination, reconnaissance, contingency planning, and presence during event, exercises, enforcement and oversight.74,63026,33483,956

Safe and secure marine activities that do not impact the Summit.

Marine industry stakeholders are capable of rapidly implementing enhanced security and/or contingency measures.

Number of incursions into the Marine Security Exclusion Zone.

Number of marine incidents affecting the G7 Summit.

Marine stakeholder response time to implement enhanced security/ contingency measures during the Summit.

Regulatory compliance.

Full collaboration with Government of Canada partners, industry.

June 8–9, 2018

Transport Canada Marine Safety and Security participated in the Federal Maritime Technical Working Group and worked collaboratively with the Port Facility Security Officers of Quebec City Saguenay, Gros-Cacouna, Trois-Rivières as well as the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation to review plans to implement MARSEC Levels prior to the Summit. A marine facility security assessment for Pointe-au-Pic was conducted prior to the Summit. Two marine security inspectors were deployed to the CCGS Pierre Radisson to provide regulatory expertise and ensure compliance.

A TC marine security inspector conducted a cruise ship and cruise ship terminal security inspection in the Port of Québec during the Summit. Two marine safety inspectors were deployed to the Cap-à-lAigle marine facility to ensure regulatory compliance of vessels transiting through or in proximity to the Maritime Interdiction Zone. One marine security manager and an inspector were deployed to G7 Maritime Cell to assist in developing and maintaining the G7 Recognized Maritime Picture.

No incursions or marine incidents occurred during the Summit.

3.9 Multimodal Safety and Security

Intermodal Surface, Security and Emergency Preparedness

Security Intelligence Assessment Branch (SIAB)

Emergency Preparedness

Monitor classified information networks to identify possible threats to transportation network that could impact G7 Summit.

Consolidate the oversight and management of common security programs and services in support of the modal Security Programs. These services include Security Intelligence Assessment, Program Support Training and Emergency Preparedness. This also includes the Special Events Secretariat that provides departmental coordination for the 2018 G7 Summit.

588,317328,039188,495

Transportation-specific information is made available to threat assessments, as appropriate.

Transportation-related threats are analyzed and communicated to appropriate stakeholders for mitigation.

Assist in preparing and communicating threat information affecting the transportation modes; assist in organizing and conducting additional training required for TC participating staff (e.g. ICS); and plan and coordinate the department’s involvement in the Summit exercise and operations.

Number of responses provided to requests for information.

Number of threats analyzed.

Number of threat products developed and/or disseminated.

100% of operational plans followed.

100% of reports disseminated.

June 8–9, 2018

Transport Canada Security Intelligence and Assessment Branch as well as the Marine Security Operations Centre (East) each deployed an intelligence analyst to participate in the Joint Intelligence Group. All operational plans were followed. Three requests for information were addressed in the days leading up to and during the Summit. 100% of threat products were disseminated internally and to stakeholders where appropriate prior to and during the Summit. The intelligence analysts also contributed to the analysis of possible threats to the G7 and provided support to the Recognized Maritime Picture.

TC’s Special Events Secretariat led the planning effort within the Department and ensured that its plans were coordinated interdepartmentally through multiple working groups, specifically the Joint Intelligence Group Working Group, the Safety and Security Working Group, the Federal Aviation Technical Working Group and the Federal Maritime Technical Working Group. The Special Events Secretariat also participated in Exercise Sentinelle II, organized and conducted internal briefings for staff deployed to the G7 Summit Integrated Command Centre, the Federal Coordination Centre and the Unified Command Centre. The Transport Canada Regional Situation Centre was also activated during the Summit.

3.5 Transportation of Dangerous Goods

3.3 Rail Safety

Participate in working groups, provide advice on risk mitigation strategies, and conduct oversight activities during the Summit.

In collaboration with the Ministère des transports du Québec (MTQ), conduct oversight activities prior to and during the Summit, and provide advice on Summit-related activities concerning the rail network.

13,44015,94435,001

In collaboration with the Ministère des transports du Québec (MTQ), safe transport of dangerous goods within the environs of the Summit.

In collaboration with Ministère des transports du Québec, safe tracks and rail operations during the Summit.

Numbers of incidents concerning the transportation of dangerous goods.

Number of incidents concerning rail operations.

Zero incidentsJune 8–9, 2018

Six transportation of dangerous goods inspectors were deployed to three locations to support Société de l’assurance automobile Québec, Contrôle routier during the conduct of road safety inspections in the days prior to and during the Summit. Two Remedial Measures Specialists were also deployed to the Summit area and were co-located with the Ministère de développement durable, l’environnement et des changements climatiques to ensure regulatory compliance in the event of a transportation of dangerous goods incident. No incidents occurred.

Transport Canada’s Rail Safety and the Surface and Intermodal Security Directorates worked collaboratively with industry stakeholders to develop contingency plans and conduct a tabletop exercise in preparation for the G7 Summit. During the Summit, two rail safety inspectors were deployed to the Quebec City area to ensure regulatory compliance.  No incidents occurred.

Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA)Pre-Board ScreeningAdditional capacity for security screening for flights departing Quebec City Jean Lesage International Airport (YQB) and the Saguenay-Bagotville Airport (YBG) following the Summit.101,321101,32149,036Screening passengers departing on commercial flights at YQB and YBG.Pre-board screening of departing passengers who present themselves at YQB and YBG following the event.100% of passengers screened in accordance with CATSA’s Standard Operating Procedures.March 31, 2019CATSA achieved 100% of pre-boarding screenings of passengers in accordance with CATSA’s SOPs.
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED)Spectrum Management and RegulationEnsuring the Summit operations area is free of radio interference and that frequency allocation to all users is very well coordinated.151,811151,81183,783Effective collaboration with security forces ensuring a Summit that is free of radio interference.Number of interference complaints.Zero complaintsMarch 31, 20197 non-preventable interference issues were resolved by ISED.

Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits

Response to Parliamentary Committees

House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) - Fiftieth Report: “Consular Services to Canadians Abroad – Global Affairs Canada, of the 2018 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada”

On June 5, 2018, the Standing Committee held a hearing on the audit. The Standing Committee produced a report, which was later adopted by the Committee on September 19, 2018.  The Report was presented to the House of Commons on October 1, 2018.  Global Affairs Canada provided a Government Response, which was presented to the House of Commons on January 16, 2019.

House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) - Sixty-fourth Report: “Physical Security at Canada’s Missions Abroad – Global Affairs Canada, of the 2018 Fall Reports of the Auditor General of Canada”  On February 26, 2019 the Standing Committee held a hearing on the audit. The Standing Committee produced a report, which was later adopted by the Committee on March 19, 2019.  The Report was presented to the House of Commons on April 9, 2019.  Global Affairs Canada provided a Government Response, which was presented to the House of Commons on June 12, 2019.

Senate of Canada Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade - A hearing on Report 4, Physical Security at Canada's Missions Abroad-Global Affairs Canada, of the 2018 Fall Reports of the Auditor General of Canada was held on February 20, 2019. Please refer to the Government's Testimony before the Senate of Canada.

Response to audits conducted by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (including audits conducted by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)

2018 Fall Report of the Auditor General of Canada: Report 4 – Physical Security at Canada’s Missions Abroad – Global Affairs Canada

2018 Fall Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development: Report 3 – Departmental Progress in Implementing Sustainable Development Strategies

Response to audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

N/A

Up Front Multi-Year Funding – Centre for International Governance Innovation

Name of recipient: Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI)

Start date: January 30, 2003

End date: Ongoing

Strategic Outcome: Canada’s International Agenda - The international agenda is shaped to advance Canadian security, prosperity, interests and values.

Link to the Program Inventory: Program 1: International Policy Coordination

Description: CIGI supports world-leading research in global governance, particularly global economic and financial governance, international security and international law. CIGI furthers Canada’s interest in having a stable and well-governed global system by bringing academics, policy experts and researchers together from around the world to generate policy recommendations on pressing international developments. In 2003, the Government of Canada contributed $30 million, which was matched by CIGI and subsequently added to by other public and private donors to establish an endowment fund. The Centre continues to be funded by the proceeds of this endowment.

Audit findings by the recipient during the reporting year, and future plan: CIGI publishes an annual report of its activities that includes financial statements.

Evaluation findings by the recipient during the reporting year, and future plan: As required by the funding agreement between CIGI and the Government of Canada, every five years, CIGI conducts an independent third-party evaluation. The last evaluation took place in 2018, and the next one will be in 2023. 

The 2018 evaluation measured the Centre’s overall performance in achieving expected results. The evaluation is organized under six evaluation standards: relevance, effectiveness, impact, planning, management and efficiency, and comparative analysis. The evaluation used a mixed-methods approach to collect and triangulate data from different sources, using both quantitative and qualitative techniques. This approach supported the development of robust, evidence-based findings, which in turn allowed for the development of insightful, validated conclusions, and recommendations.

Relevance: CIGI’s objectives, strategies and programming are clearly aligned with the funding agreement reached with the federal government. The stated purposes in the federal funding agreement are to (1) support world-leading research in the area of global governance, particularly in the area of global economic and financial governance and; (2) to further Canada’s interest in having a stable and well-governed global economic system in order to enhance the standard of living and quality of life of its population. More specifically, the purpose of the fund includes six objectives that are linked to CIGI’s objectives, strategies and activities.

Effectiveness: CIGI is using its convening power to successfully achieve its immediate outcomes by co-constructing relevant research products that are consistently being used by its national and international stakeholders. CIGI is regularly and increasingly mentioned in leading international media outlets from all around the world and the think tank has a strong presence in Canadian media, with regular mentions in all major outlets.

Impact: Assessing longer-term, sustainable and transformational change requires substantial longitudinal evidence. Evidence to date indicates that CIGI is making progress toward achieving ultimate outcomes, but definitive achievement is not identifiable yet. Key informant interviews indicate that CIGI’s efforts directed toward multilateral actors, like the programs on the G20, Internet governance or the World Refugee Council, have been the most visible and have had the highest potential in terms of impact.

Planning: The evaluation observed that CIGI has implemented the recommendations made by the last independent evaluation of CIGI conducted in 2013, most notably those related to the development of its innovation, communication and use of infrastructure strategies.

Management and efficiency: CIGI activities are sufficiently funded and have been implemented within budget. CIGI has taken significant measures to foster an evaluation culture for learning and accountability purposes, creating an Evaluation and Planning unit in 2012. CIGI has applied results-based management principles centrally and within programs and projects. An organizational logic model has been adopted and performance data is now being collected from all departments to track progress across the organization. Itis accessible via a central dashboard.

The new amalgamated Board of Directors is effective and functioning according to its governance mandate, overseeing CIGI and the proper implementation of the funding agreement. A move toward a more gender-balanced and diverse composition of its members should be considered to enrich its nature. 

Comparative analysis: CIGI compares very favourably to comparable think tanks. External rankings (Global Go To Think Tank Index Report, Transparify) generally rank CIGI in the top two or three when compared with other Canadian institutions, and often quite favourably when compared internationally. These rankings provide a positive external validation of CIGI’s work. The review of basic data from comparable think tanks in Canada (Fraser Institute, C.D. Howe Institute and Asia Pacific Foundation) demonstrates that CIGI, although a relatively young institution, is a leading think tank in Canada.

Summary of results achieved by the recipient: CIGI’s objectives, strategies and programming remain aligned with the Government of Canada funding agreement. CIGI’s work in the areas of global economy, global politics and security, and international law are considered highly relevant within the current national and international context. CIGI has understood that in a globalized world, domestic and international issues are increasingly intertwined and that governance gaps must be addressed through this lens.

CIGI has been effective in reaching its immediate and intermediate outcomes by co-constructing relevant research products (outputs) that are consistently being used by its national and international stakeholders.

For instance, this year CIGI has delivered policy relevant research papers and high-level events on priority topics including women’s economic empowerment, data governance in the digital age, NAFTA renegotiation, and China and the global economy.

CIGI has evolved as a valuable institution that is respected by its peers, conducting world-leading research and analysis, influencing policy-makers, and innovating to solve governance gaps.

Financial information (dollars)
2016–17
Actual
spending
2017–18
Actual
spending
2018–19
Planned
spending
2018–19
Total
authorities available for use
2018–19
Actual
spending (authorities used)
Variance
(2018–19 actual minus 2018–19 planned)
000000
Explanation of variancesN/A
Date modified: